Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:45:41 -0700:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 09:31:24AM +, Duncan wrote:
Would it be possible to setup a gentoo-certs package, versioned like
any other, with USE flags if necessary for installing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
You deleted a huge chunk of the ChangeLog. Might want to check for bugs
in whatever tool you're using.
That was intentional pruning since the ChangeLog was growing rather
large. Next time I'll do a separate comment and/or
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems that not everybody loves the new DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why not remove it globally?
2. why doesn't bugzi receive mail (anymore?)?
kind
I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
you have problems.
Thanks,
Donnie
--- repoman.orig2007-09-29 00:05:30.0 -0700
+++ repoman 2007-09-29 01:06:09.0 -0700
@@ -188,6
On 01:09 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
you have problems.
Thanks,
Donnie
Woops, the last one didn't exclude [[ ]] cases properly because I
On 01:33 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Take 3. Adds ROOT to variables checked.
Thanks,
Donnie
--- repoman.orig2007-09-29 00:05:30.0 -0700
+++ repoman 2007-09-29 01:33:27.0 -0700
@@ -188,6 +188,7 @@
ebuild.majorsyn:This ebuild has a major syntax error
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 01:09 Sat 29 Sep , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I put together a quick repoman patch to check for the quoting issues
that've kept coming up in reviews lately. Give it a shot and fix it if
you have problems.
Woops, the last one didn't
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems that not everybody loves the new DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
1. if everybody hates it (full ack btw), why not remove
On 28-09-2007 18:31:06 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote:
It seems that not everybody loves the new DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does. Because of
that, robbat2, KingTaco, and I came up with a procmail recipe that uses sed
to filter that new
On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems that not everybody loves the new DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL
header at the top of every bugzie email as much as robbat2 does.
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Thanks.
Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
removing those from the template (like it used to be, and is for the
other
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:58:33AM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
Thanks.
Most annoying is the many empty lines for normal comment mails that were
added. You *must* scroll down now to just read the contents. Just
removing those from
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:05:31AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
no, his MUA isnt broken ... when comments get added, there are 5 blank lines
between the bugzilla URI's and the start of actual content ...
Those existed before the change.
Otherwise, take a screenshot of before and after to
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from the second sentence, which
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Sep 2007
12:01:39 +0200:
On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It seems that not
On 29-09-2007 14:11:54 +, Duncan wrote:
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 29 Sep 2007
12:01:39 +0200:
On 29-09-2007 02:29:21 -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:23:21AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Andrew
Fabian Groffen wrote:
The problem is those replies may contain information of use in fixing the
bug. If the mail gets null-spaced...
I don't see your point. If you have a mailserver running on localhost
that accepts mail for /dev/null (i.e. it thinks it is a valid email
address) and
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
On 20:13 Thu 27 Sep , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote:
betelgeuse07/09/27 20:13:33
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:java-gnome-4.0.4.ebuild
Log:
Version bump for bug #193951.
(Portage version: 2.1.3.9)
1.1
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the
person whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug,
please visit:
Please consider lowercasing the first sentence, to stop the yelling,
and removing the repetition from
On Saturday 29 of September 2007 17:40:35 Markus Dittrich (markusle) wrote:
- 02 Jul 2007; Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] coq-8.0-r1.ebuild,
+ 02 Jul 2007; Piotr JaroszyÅski [EMAIL PROTECTED] coq-8.0-r1.ebuild,
coq-8.0_p3.ebuild:
(QA) RESTRICT clean up.
Please use UTF-8 friendly
On 04:52 Sat 29 Sep , Mike Frysinger wrote:
does this work with multilines ?
if [[ -e ${S}/asdfasdfasdf \
-f ${WORKDIR}/moo ]]
then
this is a crappy example, but entirely correct when the if statement
gets real long ...
No, it doesn't. That's why I just made it a warning instead
* Matsuu Takuto (matsuu) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 x11-wm/awesome/awesome-1.2.ebuild
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/x11-wm/awesome/awesome-1.2.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
plain:
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Petteri Räty wrote:
Donnie Berkholz kirjoitti:
On 20:13 Thu 27 Sep , Petteri Raty (betelgeuse) wrote:
betelgeuse07/09/27 20:13:33
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:java-gnome-4.0.4.ebuild
Log:
Version bump for bug
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 02:53:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
it may, see toolchain-funcs.eclass
$CC is respected from user env and nothing
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 02:53:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 29 September 2007, Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
On Sunday 30 of September 2007 00:54:29 Torsten Veller wrote:
This fails if tc-getCC returns the path to the compiler
It doesn't, see toolchain-funcs.eclass.
it may,
27 matches
Mail list logo
