Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 November 2007, Alin Năstac wrote: > Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: > >> You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: > >> - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through > >> compilation > >> - pkg_preins

Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] More general interface to use flags

2007-11-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 03 November 2007, Alec Warner wrote: > Since portage currently > uses bash and to my knowledge is not moving to POSIX shell in the near > term, I think bash is appropriate in the implementation. AKA, > everyone stop arguing about which is better. there it is, thanks -mike signature.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: > >> You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: >> - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through >> compilation >> - pkg_preinst: when installed from binary package (-k) >> > > Y

[gentoo-dev] Re: It's Bugday!

2007-11-03 Thread Ryan Hill
Peter Weller wrote: > It's bugday today, guys and gals! Come along to #gentoo-bugs on > irc.freenode.org and help fix bugs! > > As per usual, there is a list of suitable bug candidates for you guys to > help us devs out with at http://bugday.gentoo.org/. > > If anyone has any requests with regard

[gentoo-dev] Re: POSIX shell and "portable"

2007-11-03 Thread Steve Long
Roy Marples wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> Please stop calling it "more portable". The shell code you see in >> configure can in a way be called "portable". Your POSIX compliant stuff >> isn't. In fact, by stating #!/bin/sh you actually make the code useles

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/sun-jaf-bin

2007-11-03 Thread Petteri Räty
+# Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (3 Nov 2007) +# Replaced by dev-java/sun-jaf. Will be moved to Junkyard +# after the month is up. +dev-java/sun-jaf-bin + signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] It's Bugday!

2007-11-03 Thread Peter Weller
It's bugday today, guys and gals! Come along to #gentoo-bugs on irc.freenode.org and help fix bugs! As per usual, there is a list of suitable bug candidates for you guys to help us devs out with at http://bugday.gentoo.org/. If anyone has any requests with regards to adding bugs to that page, ple

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:37 Sat 03 Nov , Alin Năstac wrote: > You have to create users and groups in both pkg_ functions: > - pkg_setup : when installation is performed the usual way, through > compilation > - pkg_preinst: when installed from binary package (-k) You shouldn't, all pkg_* functions should alwa

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-proxy/polipo: ChangeLog polipo-1.0.3.ebuild polipo-1.0.1.ebuild polipo-1.0.0.ebuild polipo-0.9.12-r1.ebuild

2007-11-03 Thread Alin Năstac
Donnie Berkholz wrote: > On 15:38 Fri 02 Nov , Alin Nastac (mrness) wrote: > >> 1.1 net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild >> >> file : >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/net-proxy/polipo/polipo-1.0.3.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup >> plain: >> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.p