[gentoo-dev] Re: More general interface to use flags

2007-11-04 Thread Steve Long
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common thing is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there is no function that implements this common

[gentoo-dev] New treecleaner lead

2007-11-04 Thread Christian Heim
As the most of you might have already read on -core, I'm stepping back from being the treecleaner lead. As Raul and Samuli have been discussing the issue in a civilized manner [1], they both agreed that Samuli is taking things over. Have fun drac. 1: gentoo-dev (12:29:46) @drac armin76: you're

[gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
A little introduction: cmake is an alternative for autotools, more and more packages are using it (and some new big ones are on the way, KDE4 for example). I've wrote an eclass that makes writing ebuilds for such packages a little easier - it provides an ecmake function that takes care of few

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 12:51 Sun 04 Nov , Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: A little introduction: cmake is an alternative for autotools, more and more packages are using it (and some new big ones are on the way, KDE4 for example). I've wrote an eclass that makes writing ebuilds for such packages a little easier -

Re: [gentoo-dev] New treecleaner lead

2007-11-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:49:14 + (UTC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Heim) wrote: As the most of you might have already read on -core, I'm stepping back from being the treecleaner lead. As Raul and Samuli have been discussing the issue in a civilized manner [1], they both agreed that Samuli

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
Donnie Berkholz wrote: I've wrote an eclass that makes writing ebuilds for such packages a little easier - it provides an ecmake function that takes care of few needed variables, prefix and such. Great! When's the scons one coming? =) I don't know scons ;) # # Original Author: nelchael

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
Wulf C. Krueger wrote: KDE4 will make use of cmake-utils.eclass we wrote because Why call it cmake-utils? - we need use_enable- and use_with-like functions for cmake (makes ebuilds easier to read) Could be done. - in-source and out-of-source build support Got it too :) - we need

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-libs/libpcap: ChangeLog libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild libpcap-0.9.4.ebuild

2007-11-04 Thread Peter Volkov
В Втр, 09/10/2007 в 12:40 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет: On 17:57 Tue 09 Oct , Markus Ullmann (jokey) wrote: 1.1 net-libs/libpcap/libpcap-0.9.8.ebuild DEPEND=!virtual/libpcap PROVIDE=virtual/libpcap Does this still work properly with some of the new portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: A little introduction: cmake is an alternative for autotools, more and more packages are using it (and some new big ones are on the way, KDE4 for example). I've wrote an eclass that makes writing ebuilds for such packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: I'm a bit confused now. Both this eclass and the recently submitted cmake-utils.eclass seem to handle CMake-based packages. Can someone clarify? Yes: I've missed the discussion about cmake-utils.eclass - my version (cmake.eclass) is not needed. -- Krzysiek

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Krzysiek Pawlik
Wulf: check this patch to cmake-utils.eclass - it used pushd/popd, adds CMAKE_IN_SOURCE_BUILD in cmake-utils_src_compile and defines LIB_INSTALL_DIR (cmake-utils will be used by other packages besides KDE too). -- Krzysiek Pawlik nelchael at gentoo.org key id: 0xBC51 desktop-misc,

Re: [gentoo-dev] New treecleaner lead

2007-11-04 Thread Samuli Suominen
On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 14:29:35 +0200 Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:49:14 + (UTC) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Heim) wrote: As the most of you might have already read on -core, I'm stepping back from being the treecleaner lead. As Raul and Samuli have

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: cmake.eclass

2007-11-04 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
Hello Krzysiek! On Sunday, 04. November 2007 15:09:47 Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: Wulf: check this patch to cmake-utils.eclass - it used pushd/popd, adds CMAKE_IN_SOURCE_BUILD in cmake-utils_src_compile and defines LIB_INSTALL_DIR (cmake-utils will be used by other packages besides KDE too).

Re: [gentoo-dev] New treecleaner lead

2007-11-04 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 11:49:14AM +, Christian Heim wrote: (12:29:46) @drac armin76: you're too late, allready told phreak`` hour ago you're it (12:29:51) @drac :-) (12:29:57) @armin76 haha, no way (12:30:04) @armin76 i'm retiring *g* Heh, seems someone lost the lottery :-P

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: =dev-java/java-gnome-2* and dependencies

2007-11-04 Thread Petteri Räty
+# Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] (04 Nov 2007) +# java-gnome is now a single package so you only need +# =dev-java/java-gnome-4.0* +dev-java/cairo-java +dev-java/glib-java +dev-java/libgconf-java +dev-java/libglade-java +dev-java/libgtk-java +dev-java/libvte-java +=dev-java/java-gnome-2* +

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: More general interface to use flags

2007-11-04 Thread Alec Warner
On 11/4/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common thing is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2007-11-04 23h59 UTC

2007-11-04 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2007-11-04 23h59 UTC. Removals: x11-plugins/gaim-libnotify 2007-10-30 03:10:54 tester dev-util/ladebug2007-10-30 09:17:29 opfer gnustep-apps/viewpdf

[gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
Just to have it clear and to be sure: On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild Log: do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE (Portage version: 2.1.3.16) Index: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild -IUSE=nls static userland_GNU +IUSE=nls static

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabian Groffen wrote: Just to have it clear and to be sure: On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild Log: do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE (Portage version: 2.1.3.16) Index:

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Zac Medico wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: Just to have it clear and to be sure: On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild Log: do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE (Portage version: 2.1.3.16)

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are magical and arent available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE. it was my understanding that portage was going to get fixed to automatically include the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are magical and arent available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE. it was my understanding that portage was going to get fixed to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are magical and arent available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE. it was my

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: More general interface to use flags

2007-11-04 Thread Alec Warner
On 11/4/07, Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common thing is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, but there