On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:18 -0500
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many people are running a Portage version released after
January 4?
Eventually, all of them.
And until then, how many users are going to get things going weirdly
wrong if workarounds aren't added to everything
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:15:18 -0500
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many people are running a Portage version released after
January 4?
Eventually, all of them.
And until then, how many users are going to get things going weirdly
wrong if workarounds aren't added
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:44:43 -0500
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A better statement on your part would have been We need to ensure
compatibility for the greatest amount of users and requiring users to
have a version of Portage released after January 4th when it's only
the middle of
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:44:43 -0500
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A better statement on your part would have been We need to ensure
compatibility for the greatest amount of users and requiring users to
have a version of Portage released after January 4th when
Steve Dibb wrote:
Okay, this is my first attempt at writing an eclass, so comments are
welcome.
Okay, haven't heard anything back on this, everyone I've talked to
personally seems to think it's good to go. I've been busy with work
which is why I haven't pursued it further, but I'll be
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
As it's been explained to me by one of your fellow PMS developers, since
EAPI=0 is not complete yet, there will be no work on further EAPIs until
EAPI=0 is complete. Since this is the case and we still need to make
changes, we must revert back to the
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:42:43 -0500
Doug Klima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As it's been explained to me by one of your fellow PMS developers,
since EAPI=0 is not complete yet, there will be no work on further
EAPIs until EAPI=0 is complete.
No-one who has worked upon PMS has said that.
I
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of subversion.eclass
in the kde overlay. During that time we have added the following features to
the eclass which we would like to put back in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the
changes are fairly extensive we decided
Doug Klima wrote:
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
For quite a while the KDE herd has had a modified version of
subversion.eclass in the kde overlay. During that time we have added
the following features to the eclass which we would like to put back
in gentoo-x86 soon. Since the changes are fairly
