[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: New build types

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Long
Rémi Cardona wrote: Steve Long a écrit : First and foremost to give an environment wherein people can write their installation scripts using the language they are most comfortable with. If bash is not easy or straightforward enough for what you are trying to achieve, then I'd say the

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Josh Saddler
Doug Goldstein wrote: All, This is a formal notice to everyone that OpenRC will be hitting the Gentoo tree sooner rather then later. I would like to see *ALL* arch teams give the current code a whirl on their systems, which is available via the layman module openrc. I would also like to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: New build types

2008-03-20 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 06:51:13AM +, Steve Long wrote: Rémi Cardona wrote: Steve Long a écrit : First and foremost to give an environment wherein people can write their installation scripts using the language they are most comfortable with. If bash is not easy or straightforward

[gentoo-dev] Re: bzr.eclass into Portage

2008-03-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Petteri Räty wrote: Christian Faulhammer kirjoitti: in the Emacs overlay we imported the bzr.eclass from the xeffects overlay. In the near future Emacs development will switch from CVS to Bazaar and thus we need the new eclass in Portage to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * 174335: Some ebuild use FEATURES. Can we get them to stop doing that, or do we have to force package managers to emulate it? We seriously need a PM-independent way of saying run the testsuite, run the testsuite with

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * 174335: Some ebuild use FEATURES. Can we get them to stop doing that, or do we have to force package managers to emulate it? We seriously need a PM-independent way of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 08:52:40 +0100 Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if has userpriv ${FEATURES} ! has usersandbox ${FEATURES};then make check-local || die test suite failed else ewarn Activate FEATURES=userpriv and deactivate \ FEATURES=usersandbox to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Major changes to the Gnome2 Eclasses

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Long
Rémi Cardona wrote: Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass somewhere) I'd really appreciate it, as I really don't want to read

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: RFC: New build types

2008-03-20 Thread Petteri Räty
Steve Long kirjoitti: I don't see how it would wreak more havoc than a novice using, eg ANT from Java which s/he is comfortable with, and then further having to learn BASH peculiarities when things don't fit with the eclass. But yeah, the fun is what attracts me to the idea more than anything.

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Roy Marples
On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration will be, we'll definitely need a howto. Fun, fun. I already provide documentation with commands

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] net-libs/xulrunner-1.9 slotting or not?

2008-03-20 Thread Raúl Porcel
FYI this will be finally slotted. Turns out it couldn't be slotted because a patch we used that simulated xulrunner-1.8 pkgconfig files. But since 99% of the stuff that depends on xulrunner-1.8 won't work with xulrunner-1.9, those packages should be fixed by upstream, and they should look for

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Doug Goldstein
Roy Marples wrote: On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration will be, we'll definitely need a howto. Fun, fun. I already provide

Re: [gentoo-dev] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
2008/3/20, Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Roy Marples wrote: On Thursday 20 March 2008 06:59:24 Josh Saddler wrote: I'll be working on the migration guide with Cardoe (and possibly Roy, if we can tag-team him into submission). As much of a pain as migration will be, we'll definitely

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] OpenRC baselayout-2 meets Gentoo

2008-03-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 20 March 2008, Doug Goldstein wrote: That being said, I will be the primary point of contact on the transition to OpenRC appearing in ~arch (along with it's associated baselayout-2.0.0 ebuild). Any and all grievances, concerns, suggestions and comments can and should be routed to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remaining PMS todo list etc

2008-03-20 Thread Ryan Hill
Marius Mauch wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600 Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We seriously need a PM-independent way of saying run the testsuite, run the testsuite with user privledges, and run the testsuite with root privledges if you can, otherwise forget it. Also required is

[gentoo-dev] webmin maintainership

2008-03-20 Thread Steve Dibb
I've taken over maintainership of webmin, usermin, and already assigned the bugs to me. Thanks to armin76 for recent security bumps. That's all. Steve -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list