-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Albert Zeyer wrote:
| Hi!
[snip]
| So, what do you think?
I think it makes no sense to have a no-server no-gui option, so this just
doesn't map
cleanly to our binary use flag system.
Marijn
- --
Marijn Schouten (hkBst), Gentoo Lisp project,
I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a
local use flag.
no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can
get the same with:
-gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would be even better)
-* server instead of server-only (sure, this can
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 15:42 +0200, Benedikt Morbach wrote:
I think it should be made consistent or it should be turned into a
local use flag.
no-* or *-only flag don't make sense in my opinion, because you can
get the same with:
-gui instead of nogui (maybe -gtk/-qt4/-kde or something would
If you have a entry in package.mask for removal, please do so now.
If you want treecleaners to handle it, please state so. Already cleaned
up quite a bit today, and yeah.. it will surely look bad in GMN ;-)
Thanks, Samuli
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Samuli Suominen wrote:
If you have a entry in package.mask for removal, please do so now.
If you want treecleaners to handle it, please state so. Already cleaned
up quite a bit today, and yeah.. it will surely look bad in GMN ;-)
I'd propose to update dev-python/visual to the current beta
On 16:33 Thu 08 May , Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Enforced retirement: After 2.5 hours on the previous topics, people had
to go to sleep and jokey's computer broke. Instead of waiting till the
next regular meeting, because of its urgency, we scheduled a special
session next week at the same
Packages in $subj will be removed in 30 days because:
- upstream is dead (for years in the case of the first 2 packages)
- I don't think they have even one gentoo user (who would be crazy
enough to install gentoo while using a dialup connection?)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Albert Zeyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 15 May 2008
16:24:10 +0200:
I also don't like no* USE-flags that much. But there are already a lot
available. I thought they were introduced because it's most probable
that you want to have the specific support
