[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Ali Polatel
Arun Raghavan yazmış: Greetings All, Hey there I've been working on an ancient bug [1] requesting a split of the gnome-python, gnome-python-extras, and gnome-python-desktop ebuilds. Good for you :P *snip* Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are invited.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
Hello! 2008/5/24 Ali Polatel [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Attached is a patch for two minor issues with the eclass. First try to remove py-compile only if it exists. Second, python_mod_optimize is ROOT aware (since recently). Thanks for the feedback ... I've checked in your patch. Best, -- Arun

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Marius Mauch wrote: Hmm, in that case maybe it's be possible to use a similar system for devs, e.g. maintainer devgenone/dev /maintainer and only use the email element for non-dev maintainers and upstream contacts. Anyway, as long as we use the same tag to list both individual and group

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Marius Mauch wrote: have the raw XML file. Anyway, that's maybe more of a policy problem, we just need to enforce 'name == mail alias' (or would that be such a horrible requirement?) Ahem, yes. Consider these examples: 1) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4) [EMAIL

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Sat, 24 May 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: Changing your name because of technical difficulties? This is really not the way to go. Systems have to be adjusted to meet our needs, not the other way round (in case it is possible of course). +1 But nevertheless, it would be nice to have a

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-24 Thread Tiziano Müller
Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sat, 24 May 2008, Tiziano Müller wrote: Changing your name because of technical difficulties? This is really not the way to go. Systems have to be adjusted to meet our needs, not the other way round (in case it is possible of course). +1 But nevertheless, it

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are invited. * Don't install the COPYING file via the DOCS variable. * The LICENSE should be kept per ebuild in my opinion -- Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-24 Thread Arun Raghavan
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Arun Raghavan [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Feedback and comments (and even brickbats ;)) on the eclass are invited. * Don't install the COPYING file via the DOCS variable. * The LICENSE should be kept per ebuild in my