Christian Birchinger a écrit :
I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install
stuff like Orbit and GConf etc.
FWIW, upcoming versions of GConf will use dbus instead of orbit for IPC.
That should reduce all the trouble we've all experienced with corba/orbit.
Cheers,
Rémi
I've run into it a few times now that fluxbox users running Gentoo
wonder why they can't get icons to work in the fluxbox menus. The
short answer is that 'imlib' is off by default in many profiles,
including default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop and
default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop
I know that I
Jim Ramsay kirjoitti:
I've run into it a few times now that fluxbox users running Gentoo
wonder why they can't get icons to work in the fluxbox menus. The
short answer is that 'imlib' is off by default in many profiles,
including default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop and
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 15:00 -0400, Jim Ramsay wrote:
I've run into it a few times now that fluxbox users running Gentoo
wonder why they can't get icons to work in the fluxbox menus. The
short answer is that 'imlib' is off by default in many profiles,
including
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Christian Birchinger a écrit :
I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install
stuff like Orbit and GConf etc.
FWIW, upcoming versions of GConf will use dbus instead of orbit for IPC.
That should reduce all the trouble we've all experienced with corba/orbit.
Christian Birchinger wrote:
Hello
Anyone interested in maintaining further SDLMame updates?
Beginning with 0.126 it requires GConf to get a font setting
for it's now mandatory debugger.
I use a plain XFCE setup and don't really want to install
stuff like Orbit and GConf etc.
My patch to have
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis a écrit :
I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should respect
LDFLAGS.
Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should be patched to respect
them.
Such patches are usually small and easy to
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis a écrit :
I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages should respect LDFLAGS.
Small amount of packages which ignore LDFLAGS should be patched to respect them.
Such patches are
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:54:07 +0300:
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis a écrit :
I would like to suggest new policy stating that packages
Duncan wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
excerpted below, on Sat, 26 Jul 2008 02:54:07 +0300:
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le jeudi 24 juillet 2008 à 18:36 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis a écrit :
I would like to suggest new policy stating that
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 00:15:03 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In particular, --as-needed makes a HUGE very practical difference.
It may or may not be the wrong answer to the problem in theory, but
lacking anything even close to as workable right now, that alone is
IMO reason enough
On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of
course it's kinda difficult to always check if a package honors it or
not. But it's a good idea to file a bug for every package that does not
honor it (without
12 matches
Mail list logo
