Re: [gentoo-dev] [GLEP 56] metadata.xml status

2008-08-23 Thread Doug Goldstein
Doug Goldstein wrote: Doug Goldstein wrote: Hey all, snip Hey all (again), snip Hey all (again... again), It seems Mr_Bones and I got a bit crazy and finished off the rest of the tree, along with some help from jer. Thanks to everyone that converted a package, and a double thanks to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [GLEP 56] metadata.xml status

2008-08-23 Thread Duncan
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sat, 23 Aug 2008 02:47:54 -0400: Thanks to everyone that converted a package, and a double thanks to anyone that converted a category. GLEP 56 is now done. And thanks for your pushing it, too. =:^) -- Duncan -

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: [RFC] What features should be included in EAPI 2?

2008-08-23 Thread Steve Long
Alec Warner wrote: At least one has...do you want to vote for each feature? What will it take to convince you? It's not up to me, and I've already conceded on IRC that the consensus is against me (just letting others know); that's life *shrug* (The one missing is a src_fetch_extra or

Re: [gentoo-dev] License Interpretation

2008-08-23 Thread Richard Freeman
Donnie Berkholz wrote: Have you heard of the term contributory infringement? It means you're helping someone else break copyright law. Wouldn't somebody need to distribute the software to be in violation of copyright law? If I in legal and fully-licensed manner install a program on my PC,

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=live (instead of PROPERTIES=live-sources or RESTRICT=live)

2008-08-23 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild, will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of live source code that may vary each time that the package is installed. The intention is for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=live (instead of PROPERTIES=live-sources or RESTRICT=live)

2008-08-23 Thread Joe Peterson
Zac Medico wrote: Do the name and definition of this PROPERTIES=live value seem good? Would anybody like to discuss any changes to the name, definition, or both? ++ -Joe

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=live (instead of PROPERTIES=live-sources or RESTRICT=live)

2008-08-23 Thread Luca Barbato
Zac Medico wrote: The intention is for PROPERTIES=live to have a relatively pure and simple meaning. Ok. -- Luca Barbato Gentoo Council Member Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] PROPERTIES=live (instead of PROPERTIES=live-sources or RESTRICT=live)

2008-08-23 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: | Hi everyone, | | Please consider a PROPERTIES=live value that, when set in an ebuild, | will serve to indicate that the ebuild will use some form of live | source code that may vary each time that the package is installed. | The

[gentoo-dev] Re: Jeeves IRC replacement now alive - Willikins

2008-08-23 Thread zahra kh
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Getting the bot out there - If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the channel name, and that they are the contact for any