[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2

2008-09-09 Thread Duncan
Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:43:11 +0200: > Maybe the best solution is to drop the non-prefixed versions of 'world' > and 'system' completely Now that's an idea. It /would/ avoid the confusion, since the new concept wou

Join PTC Indonesia, Cuma Klik Iklan Langsung Dibayar dengan RUPIAH Langsung ke Bank Anda

2008-09-09 Thread fatriyanto akase
join klik rupiah (PTC INDONESIA) asli indonesia 1 klik Rp 100, 10x= Rp 1000, 20 ref = Rp 1 dibayar per Rp 5 lewat BCA atau Mandiri. Daftarnya Gratis... semua bisa tanya-jawab di forumnya, bisa beli refferal pake rupiah juga, asyik banget deh. buruan daftar kita ramaikan PTC INDONESIA.

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-09 Thread Jim Ramsay
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:31:08 +0300 > Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: > > > and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council > > > members discuss this proposal and consider voting it? > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2

2008-09-09 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:43:45 +0100 Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Second for the suggestions on how to handle the transition: > > - treating 'world' and '@world' differently is a no go from my POV. > > One of the main reasons to implement them as sets was to rem

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [RFC] PROPERTIES=virtual for meta-packages (clarification of definition)

2008-09-09 Thread Steve Long
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 08 Sep 2008 22:40:37 +0100 > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> * should be treated as being very quickly installable >> >> * should be treated as having zero cost for installs >> >> >> Both of which follow from "installs nothing." Or would you disagree? >

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-09 Thread Steve Long
Duncan wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted >> Having to write an ebuild just to install something in a package manager >> friendly way and be able to uninstall it cleanly later is a defect, not >> a feature. > I've always rather liked that I can tell someone in -dev-help or -chat "

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item: World file handling changes in Portage-2.2

2008-09-09 Thread Steve Long
Marius Mauch wrote: > Second for the suggestions on how to handle the transition: > - treating 'world' and '@world' differently is a no go from my POV. One > of the main reasons to implement them as sets was to remove special > case code in emerge, so I'm quite opposed to adding new special cases

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/xrms

2008-09-09 Thread Gunnar Wrobel
Hi, www-apps/xrms will be removed for security reasons in 30 days. See bug #235005 ( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235005). Gunnar -- Gunnar WrobelGentoo Developer __C_o_n_t_a_c_t__ Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.gunnarw

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 do* functions die

2008-09-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:45:52 +0400 Peter Volkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > В Пнд, 08/09/2008 в 23:34 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto пишет: > > So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2: > > While it's not too late. Can we make dobin, doman and other do* > functions finally die in

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2 do* functions die

2008-09-09 Thread Peter Volkov
В Пнд, 08/09/2008 в 23:34 +, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto пишет: > So we're talking about adding the following to EAPI-2: While it's not too late. Can we make dobin, doman and other do* functions finally die in EAPI=2? I've reviewed discussions on -dev [1],[2] and bug 138792 [3] and seems that t

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council members discuss this proposal and consider voting it? Does anyone have any objections to this proposal? I won't approve it for use in the tree before it's written as a GLEP in order to avoid

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-2

2008-09-09 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:31:08 +0300 Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto kirjoitti: > > and cardoe's earlier request to the council ml, can the council > > members discuss this proposal and consider voting it? > > Does anyone have any objections to this proposal? > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-09 Thread Bernd Steinhauser
Vaeth wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Having to write an ebuild just to install something in a package manager friendly way and be able to uninstall it cleanly later is a defect No, this is exactly what ebuilds meant for: That the package manager keeps track of your package, and possibly also re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Ability to pass arguments to src_configure/src_compile

2008-09-09 Thread Vaeth
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Having to write an ebuild just to install something in a package manager > friendly way and be able to uninstall it cleanly later is a defect No, this is exactly what ebuilds meant for: That the package manager keeps track of your package, and possibly also recompiles i