Re: [gentoo-dev] svn.overlays migration/downtime

2008-10-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:50:40AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi Folks, At some point over this weekend (we haven't pinned an exact time yet, details to follow), there's going to be a ~5-minute outage of overlays SVN service to move SVN onto the new server. Unless there's any objections,

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/qmail-vmailmgr

2008-10-12 Thread Thilo Bangert
# Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12 Oct 2008) # Masked for removal in 30 days (see bug #240371) # useless meta ebuild - never fully developed net-mail/qmail-vmailmgr signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] svn.overlays migration/downtime

2008-10-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:05:47PM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:50:40AM -0700, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi Folks, At some point over this weekend (we haven't pinned an exact time yet, details to follow), there's going to be a ~5-minute outage of overlays SVN

[gentoo-dev] RFC: fox.eclass update

2008-10-12 Thread Matti Bickel
Hi folks, While fixing bug #240060 I touched fox.eclass. In the process, I updated the eclass to * use versionator * cut support for fox-1.0 (loong outdated) * cut support for fox-1.5 * use eautomake instead of =automake-1.4* * use emake instead of make * use elog instead

[gentoo-dev] System packages in (R)DEPEND?

2008-10-12 Thread Thomas Sachau
I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also see ebuilds depending on them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about removing different packages from the system set. So now my question is: Should we depend on all system packages?

[gentoo-dev] Re: System packages in (R)DEPEND?

2008-10-12 Thread Duncan
Thomas Sachau [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 12 Oct 2008 19:04:21 +0200: I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also see ebuilds depending on them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2008-10-12 23h59 UTC

2008-10-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2008-10-12 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-tex/vntex 2008-10-06 19:53:29 aballier media-sound/gogo2008-10-08 16:08:15 mr_bones_

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)

2008-10-12 Thread Steve Long
Peter Volkov wrote: Robert Buchholz ?: Thilo Bangert wrote: HOMEPAGE=http://this-package-has-no-homepage.gentoo.org/; Why not use our package site for this, i.e. HOMEPAGE=http://packages.gentoo.org/package/${CAT}/${PN}; This is not homepage. HOMEPAGE should point to package

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-lang/python: ChangeLog python-2.6.ebuild python-2.5.2-r6.ebuild

2008-10-12 Thread Steve Long
Thomas Sachau wrote: what about this: insinto /usr/share/doc/${P}/examples Is there any chance we can start using correctly quoted filenames across the board? [EMAIL PROTECTED] NB: I'm raising this as a talking-point, not pushing it as an agenda, so please don't reply if discussion doesn't

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-12 Thread Steve Long
Jeremy Olexa wrote: Fabian Groffen wrote: snip Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd, nbsd and obsd to their long