On Saturday 04 April 2009 08:59:22 Thomas Sachau wrote:
> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are mainly 2
> different ideas:
>
> 1. Do the main stuff in the package manager (e.g. if the ARCH is amd64
On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:17:56 Fabian Groffen (grobian) wrote:
> grobian 09/04/04 17:17:56
>
> Modified: toolchain-funcs.eclass
> Log:
> Add support for all Prefix arches, in particular for gen_usr_ld_script,
> and add AIX specific function, backport from Prefix
you reall
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 17:57:54 +
"Fabian Groffen (grobian)" wrote:
> grobian 09/04/04 17:57:54
>
> Modified: flag-o-matic.eclass
> Log:
> backport fix for x86-macos in filter-flags from Prefix
>
> Revision ChangesPath
> 1.133eclass/flag-o-matic.eclas
Hi,
Repost of news item as I forgot to cc the PR project. Commit postponed
by one day.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Repost of news item as I forgot to cc the PR project. Commit postponed
by one day.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
Title: Migration from teTeX to TeXLive
Author: Christian Faulh
On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
>
> For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
> unless it's either explicitly listed in IUSE or handled via a number of
> special magic profile variables,
Hi,
"Heath N. Caldwell" :
> How about:
>
> teTeX is obsolete and has been unsupported upstream since May of 2006.
> All users who still have teTex installed should uninstall it and
> install TeXLive using the upgrade guide accessible at the following
> URL: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texli
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 21:36:40 +0200
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 12:24:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > > Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why we
> > > couldn't change what USERLAND means.
> >
> > But why change the meaning if it's confusing an unnecessary?
> > Perh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>> Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
>> IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
>> doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXP
Hi,
Ulrich Mueller :
> > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Heath N Caldwell wrote:
>
> > On 2009-04-04 00:57, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> >> please review attached news item.
>
> Well, I'd thought that last rites plus the message in package.mask
> were enough (it also mentions the URL of the migration
On 04-04-2009 12:24:32 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
> > Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why we
> > couldn't change what USERLAND means.
>
> But why change the meaning if it's confusing an unnecessary?
> Perhaps it's more appropriate to set IUSE_IMPLICIT="prefix".
This sounds
Zac Medico wrote:
> Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>>> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
>>> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
>>>
>> Sure it's no
Hi,
Petteri Räty :
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please see attached news item for review.
> >
> > V-Li
> >
> >
>
> s/emerging/updating/
Fixed.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
http://gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
>> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kerne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 12:20:09 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> Actually, after further inspection of PMS, it seems that the
> IUSE_IMPLICIT is more appropriate for the 'prefix' flag since it
> doesn't seem to fit into the USE_EXPAND paradigm.
Were we after k
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico wrote:
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> So, my recommendation is to:
>> 1) mask the prefix USE flag in base/use.mask because no one except the
>> prefix profiles should use this flag.
>> 2) unmask and force the USE flag in prefix profile.
>> 3) add
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
>
> Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
> It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
>
Sure it's not a user land like GNU or BSD but I can't see why w
On Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:16:29 +0200
Ehret Stefan wrote:
> Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:05:04 Ehret Stefan wrote:
> >> Hello
> >>
> >> I would ask if I can maintainer following packages for
> >> the gentoo-amd64 arch.
> >>
> >> app-crypt/truecrypt
> > What about bug #24
"Santiago M. Mola" said:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> >
> > i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
> > within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are
> > mainly 2 different ideas:
>
> The proposals are
Thilo Bangert wrote:
> > 'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
> > used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
>
> i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
> having --info be the same no matter who you like best is
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:05:04 Ehret Stefan wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I would ask if I can maintainer following packages for
>> the gentoo-amd64 arch.
>>
>> app-crypt/truecrypt
> What about bug #241650?
>
the license seems to be a problem
but what is with the other packa
> 'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
> used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
having --info be the same no matter who you like best is
incredibly usefull.
while we a
On Saturday 04 April 2009 13:05:04 Ehret Stefan wrote:
> Hello
>
> I would ask if I can maintainer following packages for
> the gentoo-amd64 arch.
>
> app-crypt/truecrypt
What about bug #241650?
--
Timothy `Drizzt` Redaelli
FreeSBIE Developer, Gentoo Developer, GUFI Staff
There are two major pro
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support within
> our tree and package
> managers. From what i know, there are mainly 2 different ideas:
The proposals are not exactly these.
1. Make package manag
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 15:17:30 +0200
Peter Alfredsen wrote:
> While it may be useful to post all the information about the
> package-manager for *you*, it's not helping us (bug-wranglers) any. We
> need one screenfull of text that concisely shows us the state of your
> system.
There is no magic way
Paludis --info does not work for me. Plz2fix.
In particular, have a look at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262277#c4
Where both emerge --info and paludis --info is posted. Sometimes, more
is less.
While it may be useful to post all the information about the
package-manager for *you*, it's
On 04-04-2009 14:22:09 +0200, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
> > However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> > IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> > don't really like this idea because it exposes the u
Am Saturday 04 April 2009 14:59:22 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
> Hi folks,
>
>
> i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support
> within our tree and package managers. From what i know, there are mainly 2
> different ideas:
>
> 1. Do the main stuff in the package manager (e.g. if
Robert Buchholz schrieb:
> On Monday 30 March 2009, Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> Ciaran McCreesh schrieb:
>>> So far, we've got this, by agreement of the Council:
>>>
>>> * There will be a default src_install in EAPI 3
>>> * It will have a DOCS variable, or something along those lines.
>>>
>>> I'd like
On 04-04-2009 15:21:23 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> You can set USERLAND="GNU PREFIX"
Prefix is not a userland, please understand that.
It's like pizza not being an elibc, or beer not being a kernel.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Hello
I would ask if I can maintainer following packages for
the gentoo-amd64 arch.
app-mobilephone/openmoko-dfu-util
app-crypt/truecrypt
media-sound/songbird
Regards,
stefan
Hi folks,
i would like to hear about other opinions about real multilib support within
our tree and package
managers. From what i know, there are mainly 2 different ideas:
1. Do the main stuff in the package manager (e.g. if the ARCH is amd64 and the
package has x86
keyword, the package manage
Le 03/04/2009 16:47, Jeremy Olexa a écrit :
However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
don't want it exposed to the users.
Just of c
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>> On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
that can be hidden.
>>> It is not.
>> But can be added.
>
> I
On 04-04-2009 14:54:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> Fabian Groffen wrote:
> > On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
> >> that can be hidden.
> >
> > It is not.
>
> But can be added.
I think we talk about di
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
>> that can be hidden.
>
> It is not.
>
>
But can be added.
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 04-04-2009 14:31:20 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> If prefix is in USERLAND then you have a userland_prefix use flag to use
> that can be hidden.
It is not.
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
>>> IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
>>> don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
>>> don
On 04-04-2009 13:23:24 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> >
> > However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> > IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> > don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
> > don't want it exposed
>
> However, we have toyed with other ideas. One of which is to introduce
> IUSE=prefix in prefix.eclass similar to the USE=multilib approach. I
> don't really like this idea because it exposes the use flag and we
> don't want it exposed to the users.
>
If you don't want it exposed to users, the
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> please see attached news item for review.
>
> V-Li
>
>
s/emerging/updating/
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
41 matches
Mail list logo
