Hello,
On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
wrote:
> Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
> two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
>
I would like to kick-start the nominations by nominating Mart Raudsepp
(leio), Petteri Räty (betelgeuse),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello fellow developers and users.
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2009/2010 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 14/06/2009).
All nominations must be sent to the gentoo-dev mailing list. If you
were nominated and want to run, you
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-05-31 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
app-text/ghostscript-esp2009-05-26 05:59:58 pva
kde-base/pykde 2009-05-26 14:20:21 tampakrap
app-office/kmm_ban
Patrick Lauer wrote:
If I should have forgotten any approach or misrepresented one I'd
appreciate an updated or rephrased section so it can be easily
updated.
This keeps coming up for some reason:
parsers: It enforces some minor limitations, for example EAPI needs to
be unique and cannot be
Duncan wrote:
A team can have the best rhetoric in the world, but if they don't
actually show up and field a team on game day, they lose by default.
Fortunately or unfortunately, that looks to be where this is headed.
Agreed, there is definitely something to be said for offering solutions.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
> "I've attached a script to count how many instances of each license
> there are, and how many instances in each group. Here are the group
> counts I get:
> @FSF-APPROVED 23641
> @GPL-COMPATIBLE 22956
> @OSI-APPROVED 23284
> @oth
Hello people,
as the discussion about glep55 has gone in circles long enough I decided to
collect the various ideas presented around that theme complex and compare them
in a way that might allow us to reach a sane decision.
Since it has become quite a lot of text I've kept some parts in sentenc
Thilo Bangert posted
200905311126.00274.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Sun, 31 May
2009 11:25:56 +0200:
> the thing is though, nothing constructive is being said. people are
> going in circles. ciaran and co are pushing glep55 for reasons which
> they have stated gazillion of times and
Alistair Bush wrote:
> This patch removes the functionality within java-utils-2.eclass to
> record and pass to java-config old style virtuals.
> This functionality is not utilized within any repo that I know about and
> is _most probably_ horribly broken anyway.
>
> _ALL_ ebuilds that are using th
Richard Freeman said:
> Ryan Hill wrote:
> > I'm tired of playing, as I'm sure you are. So please,
> > let's be quiet now, and let the big people talk.
>
> This is a public list designed to facilitate discussion of gentoo
> software development. Anybody with something constructive to say is
> mo
10 matches
Mail list logo
