[gentoo-dev] Patch: java-vm-2.eclass support for java build-only vm's

2009-08-24 Thread Alistair Bush
Simple patch as part of java-config's support for marking EOL and security vulnerable vm's to be marked as 'build only'. Users setting these as either their system or user vm will be warned of the risks of doing so. The release of java-config with this functionality, this eclass and some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for dev-ruby/cgi_multipart_eof_fix

2009-08-24 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 23:46 +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote: # Hans de Graaff gra...@gentoo.org (22 Aug 2009) # cgi_multipart_eof_fix is used to fix ruby versions up to 1.8.5. # We no longer ship these versions, and all versions in the tree # are unaffected, so this will be removed in 30 days.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo stats server/client @ 2009-08-22

2009-08-24 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org: I'm aware that with currently ~13,000 packages in tree and ~4,000 packages in the Gentoo Smolt database the zero-install list holds ~7,000 packages. With more submission I expect that number to decrease strongly in the future. With that in

[gentoo-dev] Re: Two-level portage tree is irrelevant.

2009-08-24 Thread Duncan
Andrew D Kirch posted on Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:14:56 -0400 as excerpted: Dmitry Grigoriev wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=282491 The idea is that package tree physical structure must correspond to logical structure. E.g. package kde/games/tactics-and-strategy/knetwalk instead of

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 and nonfatal die

2009-08-24 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org: On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100 David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote: Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1 make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new die variant that respects nonfatal, #4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 and nonfatal die

2009-08-24 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 08:20:44PM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: Hi, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org: On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100 David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote: Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1 make die respect nonfatal,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 3 and nonfatal die

2009-08-24 Thread Zac Medico
Ryan Hill wrote: On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:56:41 +0100 David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote: Does anyone have any opinions on which of the four options (#1 make die respect nonfatal, #2 make die always die, #3 add a new die variant that respects nonfatal, #4 make regular die respect