Fabian Groffen wrote:
Perhaps we could add a new function to the flag-o-matic that does the
CHOST check, and appends the flag, so the check code wouldn't have to be
duplicated in ebuilds? It should be rather trivial.
ok, chost check would be cheap. how about,
usage: append-ldflags
Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:45:21 +0300 Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is actually true. Maybe all devs should have access on docs
since the docs teams are dead. I would suggest to let all
developers contribute to documentation whether they belong to docs
team
On 04-10-2009 13:13:30 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
+# @FUNCTION: no-as-needed
+# @RETURN: Flag to disable asneeded behavior for use with append-ldflags.
+no-as-needed() {
+ case $($(tc-getLD) -v 21 /dev/null) in
+ *GNU*) # GNU ld
+ echo -Wl,--no-as-needed ;;
+
Hi,
I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is no
longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
I find this a questionable idea simply for the overhead it causes, but it
seems that this breaks all
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla:
Please review all the files I
2009-10-04 20:32:17 Hanno Böck napisał(a):
I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is no
longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
Since eselect-python-20090804 /usr/bin/python is a symlink to
Hi,
Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org:
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who
cares about networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary.
I'm pretty sure.
Thank you.
V-Li
--
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
Joshua Saddler wrote:
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
GDP, and interested devs who can contribute patches to Bugzilla:
Please
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 21:42, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
There. I did the x86 and amd64 handbooks (networked, anyway; who cares about
networkless). They're now ready for the 10th anniversary. I'm pretty sure.
I also did the x86 quickinstall handbooks.
Thanks Joshua!
--
I've discussed this with Diego and Roy today, the only 2 persons who had
such systems. The end result was that there's no developers for the
arch, and we can let it die. It was a nice experiment but didn't fly.
So in conclusion I've removed the profiles from profiles.desc, so
repoman won't
Samuli Suominen wrote:
All this spawned from the fact that dev-lang/python is now using
external toolchain package, dev-libs/libffi, which nobody can test. So,
if you can't have libffi, you can't have python and you can't have portage.
With that regard,
Also mips and m68k are undone...
Samuli Suominen wrote:
So in conclusion I've removed the profiles from profiles.desc, so
repoman won't complain about it.
Scratch that. Reverted. Repoman is way too loud with it removed. Let's
simply remove it where seen in slow pace.
-Samuli
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-10-04 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
games-emulation/fceultra2009-09-29 06:16:42
mr_bones_
games-emulation/gfceu 2009-09-29 06:17:16
lör 2009-10-03 klockan 14:21 -0600 skrev Ryan Hill:
On Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:13:59 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Since new binutils will support LD_AS_NEEDED=1 to force ld behave
asneeded we could use this for the developer -target in profiles?
Speak up if you think
14 matches
Mail list logo
