On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 04:03:28 +0200
Peter Hjalmarsson x...@rymdraket.net wrote:
For FEATURES=test a policy for how to handle stuff like:
if use test; then
elog
ewarn You have unit tests enabled, this results in an insecure
library
ewarn It
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
2009-10-04 20:32:17 Hanno Böck napisał(a):
I just stepped over a problem with the new python-wrapper. If I interpreted
the changelogs correctly, since eselect-python-20090801 /usr/bin/python is
no
longer a symlink, but a wrapper.
Since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
The problem here IMO is that this wrapper executes python2.6 with argv0 set
to python2.6, while it should be the argv0 from how the wrapper was executed.
At least this is what init.d scripts expect (seen with ntlmaps
On 05-10-2009 16:32:58 -0400, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
The problem here IMO is that this wrapper executes python2.6 with argv0 set
to python2.6, while it should be the argv0 from how the wrapper was
executed.
At least this is what init.d scripts expect (seen
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
darkside09/10/05 21:22:30
Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
Log:
Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
(Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
+ # Prefix compat. In Gentoo Linux, defaults to ${D}
+
Dne pondělí 05 Říjen 2009 23:31:03 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
darkside09/10/05 21:22:30
Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
Log:
Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
(Portage version: 2.1.6.13/cvs/Linux x86_64)
+
2009/10/5 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne pondělí 05 Říjen 2009 23:31:03 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
darkside 09/10/05 21:22:30
Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
Log:
Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
(Portage
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Now, with this email I
fully expect a reply from /someone/ saying that the Gentoo Prefix
implementation is just plain wrong to which, I am going to silently
ignore.
Good plan. As they say, don't feed the trolls. No matter
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:49:54 -0500
Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Now, with this email I fully expect a reply from /someone/ saying
that the Gentoo Prefix implementation is just plain wrong to which,
I am going to silently ignore.
No, everyone already knows what you're doing wrong,
Hello,
See attached news item for consideration.
Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very
welcome.
--
Mart Raudsepp
Gentoo Developer
Mail: l...@gentoo.org
Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio
Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.26
Author: Gentoo Gnome Team
10 matches
Mail list logo
