Some devs have complained about the directory structure in the
gentoo-news being too complicated. News item files are currently found
in a third-level subdirectory:
/MM/-MM-DD-itemname/
On the rsync side the year and month subdirs are absent:
metadata/news/-MM-DD-itemname/
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Opinions?
Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
unless we remove really old items (like = 2 years old).
--
Alex || wired
On Thursday 08 October 2009 13:57:40 Alex Alexander wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Opinions?
Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
unless we remove really old items (like = 2 years old).
Crowded? I don't think so
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Crowded? I don't think so :)
The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
all in the same folder
I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it more often :)
But yeah,
Alex Alexander wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Crowded? I don't think so :)
The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
all in the same folder
I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:29:25 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most users
have
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most
users have upgraded?
The news module in
2009-09-20 20:46:17 Nirbheek Chauhan napisał(a):
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
There is a difference between Python scripts and Python modules.
Yes, I'm well aware of the difference between them.
[snip]
Python modules
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and the list of ebuilds is
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script
and
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused.
On čtvrtek 08 Říjen 2009, 23:34:10 Petteri Räty wrote:
Even this is wrong because:
Hi
...
betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10
IUSE nls
For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing
=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and EAPI 3 is not needed. I
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:22:26 Petteri Räty wrote:
across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms
can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks
in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI
Comments like
14 matches
Mail list logo
