Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
test run makes a lot of sense.
I can put it into run with the tinderbox, no problem with that.
But I think that we should really use both: Patrick's
On Saturday 19 December 2009 07:33:33 Diego Elio “Flameeyes” Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno ven, 18/12/2009 alle 23.56 -0800, Brian Harring ha scritto:
For changes of this sort, abusing the tinderboxes to get a real world
test run makes a lot of sense.
I can put it into run with the tinderbox,
Distutils/Setuptools/Distribute modify shebangs of installed Python scripts, so
that they
contain path of Python interpreter with version included (e.g.
#!/usr/bin/python3.2).
This behavior has both advantage and disadvantages:
- Scripts of packages supporting only e.g. Python 2 can be
On 12/19/2009 05:32 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Maybe I am wrong, but it could be a different question (not a code
snippets like the other questions under 6.) with something like:
21. What would you do when needing to manually run make or
./configure instead of econf/emake?
I can't see any valid
