Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar yaou 28 a viz Genver 2010 e 23 eur 31, « Robin H. Johnson » he deus skrivet : On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Bertrand Jacquin
D'ar gwener 29 a viz Genver 2010 e 00 eur 23, « Philipp Riegger » he deus skrivet : On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 16:17:41 +0100 Beber be...@meleeweb.net wrote: So, I did a wrapper to emerge --buildpkg to create tbz2 with SHA1 in names function of USE, like : CHOST=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/28/2010 09:24 PM, Max Arnold wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to

[gentoo-dev] openssl 1.0.0 quick test

2010-01-30 Thread Hanno Böck
Hi, I recently installed the masked openssl 1.0.0_beta5 and tried to rebuild everything against the new version of openssl. I know it's probably not very urgend to get on that, but I thought others might be interested in the status. - php fails, fix is trivial. I've sent it upstream and it got

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Max Arnold
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 03:59:27AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: On 01/28/2010 09:24 PM, Max Arnold wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote: So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Jacob Godserv
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 10:13, Max Arnold lwa...@gmail.com wrote: Can someone share his experience of using Catalyst or Metro as generator of binary package updates for precompiled client machines?  How smooth it is in the long run? I use metro (wrote a little HOWTO on it:

[gentoo-dev] Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Sat, 30 Jan 2010 03:59:27 -0800 as excerpted: The clients need sys-apps/portage installed, but not the whole portage tree (although the profiles directory can be useful for the profile and package moves). The clients should set PORTAGE_BINHOST in make.conf, so that binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Building custom package for multi-arch/system

2010-01-30 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/30/2010 10:11 AM, Duncan wrote: Thanks. I knew the PORTAGE_BINHOST and --config-root bits, but hadn't thought about the tree not being needed, save for the profiles. I recently setup a netbook based on a Gentoo image compiled elsewhere, and while it's now functional, I'm still