On 07-03-2010 01:19:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
# Fabian Groffengrob...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010)
# Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to
# support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928
# Pending removal on April 6, 2010
app-antivirus/f-prot
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 07-03-2010 01:19:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
Fabian Groffen wrote:
# Fabian Groffengrob...@gentoo.org (06 Mar 2010)
# Masked for security issues and discontinued interest from upstream to
# support non-Windows platforms. Bug #233928
# Pending removal on April 6,
From ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com Sun Mar 07 02:25:46 2010
Return-path: ubuntu-bugs-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com
Envelope-to: arch...@mail-archive.com
Delivery-date: Sun, 07 Mar 2010 02:25:46 -0800
Received: from exprod5mx284.postini.com ([64.18.0.108] helo=psmtp.com)
by
Le 01/03/2010 11:38, Samuli Suominen a écrit :
I'd prefer EAUTORECONF (as it's already used in xfconf.eclass for the
same purpose, and has no reason to differ) or even SNAPSHOT, but XORG_
prefix seems redudant
We decided to put the prefix to make things clearer for ebuild writers
and to make
On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:30:55 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
What I wonder now is:
- Will it work with our very instance of Bugzilla?
The security team uses (or at least has used in the past) flags on Gentoo
Bugzilla.
- Can certain flag states be required when searching?
It looks like you need
On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like -Wl,-O1,--as-needed won't be affected by any
kind of
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org said:
On 03/04/10 19:22, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been
fixed.
Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19.
#python on Freenode still reads It's
On 03/07/2010 07:11 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org said:
On 03/04/10 19:22, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been
fixed.
Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19.
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the patches should always be
applied) where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
currently annoying because it always adds the
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
On 03/06/10 23:27, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 15:27:21 ChIIph wrote:
Here are some minor changes I'd like to propose to flag-o-matic's
_filter-var() to work properly with LDFLAGS.
Without this, things like
On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
[snip]
The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only used
on
LDFLAGS. your patch opens the door to
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:59:25 ChIIph wrote:
On 03/07/10 14:50, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 12:54:34 ChIIph wrote:
[snip]
The commas are only added when there's LDFLAGS being changed.
you missed my point. read the whole eclass -- this function isnt only
used on
On 03/07/2010 07:11 PM, Mark Loeser wrote:
Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
works with the new version of python, it should not be stabilized. The
stable tree should all Just Work together. Stabilizing python-3 at this
point would be the equivalent
On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
+1
no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should
be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing)
I don't think upstream considers python 3 experimental so when it can be
installed side by side with 2.6 so that
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the patches should always be
applied) where autotools should be run. always inheriting autotools is
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the patches should always
be applied) where
On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sometimes i have optional patches (ignoring the
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:26:24 +0200
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:32 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
no need to stabilize experimental python, not even convinced it should
be in ~arch yet (but package.masked for testing)
I don't think upstream considers python 3
On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/05/2010 08:59 PM, Mike
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2010-03-07 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-libs/libredblack2010-03-01 12:05:12 ssuominen
net-libs/libnemesi 2010-03-01 12:09:43 ssuominen
On Thursday 04 March 2010 16:52:50 Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Hello
I have managed to split the desktop profile to gnome and kde submenus. The
result can be found in kde-crazy overlay (not in layman) [1]
I splitted every desktop/ folder i found. The following issues raised
though: 1) I didn't
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:11:47 -0500
Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Has QA given their blessing to this?
Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
works with the new version of python, it should not be stabilized. The
stable tree should all Just Work
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 19:09:28 +
David Leverton levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 15:26:10 Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer to have two keywords at least, one for
candidates and another for confirmed bugs.
This sounds like the sort of thing
On Sat, 6 Mar 2010 21:39:32 -0500
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:03:16 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
If no one objects, I will look forward to committing the patch in a
week or two.
commit it already :p
Thanks for the reminder. In the same commit have
On Wednesday 24 February 2010 12:16:24 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
While you're touching this, could you improve this part a bit:
# maybe the user is screwing around with perms they shouldnt #289168
if [[ ! -r ${base} ]] ; then
eerror Unable to read ${base} -- perms are screwed ?
die fix
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:08:14PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010 12:11:47 -0500
Mark Loeser halc...@gentoo.org wrote:
Has QA given their blessing to this?
Absolutely not. Its actually the opposite. Until 90+% of the tree just
works with the new version of python, it
On 03/07/2010 11:44 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 14:08:29 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 08:36 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 07 March 2010 13:31:56 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 03/07/2010 07:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010 02:11:15 Petteri Räty
Petteri Räty posted on Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:25:07 +0200 as excerpted:
n my opinion python-3 should go stable when there's enough ebuilds
needing it as a dependency. It doesn't need to nowhere near 90% of
python packages in the tree.
Indeed.
Given that it's slotted and (barring bugs) won't
On Saturday 06 March 2010, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
In either case, I'm starting to wonder if the change is just trivial
enough to get done in svn2git or git-svn directly. I think other
properties are already there.
The git-svn man page states that a transformation is not trivial. I
don't know
On 03/07/2010 01:49 AM, Robert Buchholz wrote:
On Saturday 06 March 2010, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
In either case, I'm starting to wonder if the change is just trivial
enough to get done in svn2git or git-svn directly. I think other
properties are already there.
The git-svn man page states
30 matches
Mail list logo
