This notice is mainly intended for everybody that maintains kernel
sources ebuilds in their overlay.
This evening I merged the deblob support from bug #266157, and depending
on your kernel source ebuilds, you may need to run a digest pass or
tweak them.
There are two new variables recognized by
To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
This is only an initial idea, and maybe a different implementation would
be better (like the status whiteboard, if it's easily searchable).
Initially, I'd like a new flag
On 04/26/2010 11:40 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
Can you explain how the TESTED Keyword is not sufficient for your
goal? It explicitly states: Ebuilds that have been marked as
On 4/26/10 12:34 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
On 04/26/2010 11:40 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers'
comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla.
Can you explain how the TESTED Keyword is not sufficient for your
goal? It
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:40:07AM +0200, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Also, I think it may be useful for other arch teams (like amd64). One
solution would be to add yet another flag, like amd64-at, but maybe we
can have some better ideas.
The problem here is that it becomes extremely messy when
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
snip
Use common sense here.
^^ Seems pretty clear to me.
Hi,
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org:
How about the following instead, going into the status whiteboard:
AT:x86:+
AT:x86:-
AT:x86:?
with the same meanings that you defined.
It should be just as easy to search, and you can do it today already.
Yes, sounds good. What is the best way
# Paul Varner fuzzy...@gentoo.org (26 Apr 2010)
# Masking for removal (bug #315947).
# It doesn't compile with newer versions of zlib, still uses gtk1+, and
# upstream is unresponsive. Unfortunately, there is not a suitable
# replacement.
app-text/manedit
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:40:07 +0200
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
After a consensus is reached, I'm going to file a bug for infra for
necessary changes in bugzilla configuration.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/213514
--
fonts,by
