Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set a trap? trap eshopts pop RETURN ? That strikes me as a horribly fragile way of doing things that's bound to come back and screw things up at some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: eclass/php5_1.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Alex Alexander
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 03:05:18PM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 17 Jul 2010 22:23:03 +0200 Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/17/2010 09:58 PM, Matti Bickel wrote: since there's no dev-lang/php-5.1*

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Sunday 18 of July 2010 03:54:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: grep EAPI-TOO-OLD $(portageq portdir)/eclass/* /home/gentoo-cvs/gentoo-x86/eclass/kde4-functions.eclass: *) DEPEND=EAPI-TOO-OLD ;; /home/gentoo-cvs/gentoo-x86/eclass/poppler.eclass:has 2 ${EAPI} || DEPEND=EAPI-TOO-OLD

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:23:36 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: status quo should be challenged occasionally. Fixed autotools-utils.eclass, kde4-functions.eclass, virtuoso.eclass case ${EAPI:-0} in 2|3|4) ;; - *) DEPEND=EAPI-TOO-OLD ;;

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some help here. Thanks Down to 7 now. jer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Alex Alexander
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some help here. Thanks Down to 7 now. wow. nice work! -- Alex Alexander :: wired

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: bug wrangler queue is large...

2010-07-19 Thread Pacho Ramos
El lun, 19-07-2010 a las 21:05 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió: On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 08:01:38PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:50:00 +0300 Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: The queue is almost 100 bugs long again. We could really use some help here.

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Francesco R
2010/7/19 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:23:36 +0200 Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: status quo should be challenged occasionally. Fixed autotools-utils.eclass, kde4-functions.eclass, virtuoso.eclass case ${EAPI:-0} in 2|3|4)

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set a trap? trap eshopts pop RETURN ? That strikes me as a horribly fragile way of doing things that's

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set a trap? trap eshopts pop RETURN

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 20:43, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set a trap? trap eshopts pop RETURN  ? That

Re: [gentoo-dev] Over using preserve_old_lib, don't do that

2010-07-19 Thread Jim Ramsay
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:28:40PM +0200, Markus Hauschild wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Mike Auty ike...@gentoo.org wrote: Ideally, these calls should either adhere to FEATURES=-preserve-libs, or there should be a tool that can identify which files portage has preserved, and

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 16:07:56 David Leverton wrote: On 19 July 2010 20:43, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 21:30, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i imagine this might be useful in some scenarios, but i think the more common usage is to enable things inline.  otherwise, the exported API would need to be wrapped internally like: get_all_version_components() {        

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 16:45:22 David Leverton wrote: On 19 July 2010 21:30, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i imagine this might be useful in some scenarios, but i think the more common usage is to enable things inline. otherwise, the exported API would need to be wrapped

Re: [gentoo-dev] new warnings to catch from gcc in portage

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
no feed back, so pushed to latest portage. guess we'll see what blows up. -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread David Leverton
On 19 July 2010 22:11, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: you mean the people who want to use get_all_version_components would have to change their invocation to go through eshops_need ?  otherwise i dont follow what you mean. You define the function, then call eshopts_need immediately

Re: [gentoo-dev] versionator.eclass: convert to eshopts_{push,pop}

2010-07-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday, July 19, 2010 17:44:21 David Leverton wrote: On 19 July 2010 22:11, Mike Frysinger wrote: you mean the people who want to use get_all_version_components would have to change their invocation to go through eshops_need ? otherwise i dont follow what you mean. You define the

Re: [gentoo-dev] New eclass: autotools-utils.eclass

2010-07-19 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sunday 18 July 2010 04:54:43 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On 18-07-2010 00:58, Brian Harring wrote: On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 02:56:05AM +0300, Alexis Ballier wrote: case ${EAPI:-0} in 2|3|4) ;; *) DEPEND=EAPI-TOO-OLD ;; esac why not: case ${EAPI:-0} in