Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Thomas Beierlein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jorge, On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:04:59 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: If you want to use sqlite3 as default and assuming your prefer postgres over mysql, you can use the following and drop the die from pkg_setup.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 23.7.2010 09:06, Thomas Beierlein napsal(a): Hi Jorge, interesting. I did not know that an ebuild can use-depend on itself. Good to know. I had implemented a simpler solution in meantime. But I will test your solution. It would shorten the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Tiziano Müller
Am Freitag, den 23.07.2010, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Beierlein: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jorge, On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:04:59 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: If you want to use sqlite3 as default and assuming your prefer postgres

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Thomas Beierlein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:31:30 +0200 Tiziano Müller dev-z...@gentoo.org wrote: Am Freitag, den 23.07.2010, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Beierlein: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jorge, On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:04:59 +

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:30:02 +0200 Thomas Beierlein tom...@gentoo.org wrote: interesting. I did not know that an ebuild can use-depend on itself. Good to know. No, not good. It doesn't make any sense. Can you give some reasoning for that?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Thomas Beierlein
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:38:56 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote: So I will help with my 2c :P I reworked the bacula for the purposes at my company:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-07-2010 09:31, Tiziano Müller wrote: Am Freitag, den 23.07.2010, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Thomas Beierlein: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jorge, On Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:04:59 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 23-07-2010 11:37, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:30:02 +0200 Thomas Beierlein tom...@gentoo.org wrote: interesting. I did not know that an ebuild can use-depend on itself. Good to know. No, not good. It doesn't make any sense.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:30:35 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: In any case, abusing DEPEND isn't a mechanism for implementing use requirements. You should use the mechanism that's designed for use requirements to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fw: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-backup/bacula: bacula-5.0.2-r2.ebuild ChangeLog

2010-07-23 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 12:28:21 + Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: Nothing prevents us from using the above, which already produces the same output as basic use dependencies, so users should be getting used to it by now. It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection

2010-07-23 Thread Maciej Mrozowski
On Tuesday 22 of June 2010 19:14:38 Arun Raghavan wrote: On 20 June 2010 20:12, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Any objections? I'll wait till Wed (June 23rd) before adding this if there aren't any. Is anyone here vehemently against introspection. Not vehemently, but