[gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-26 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 26 Aug 2010 14:29:42 -0400 as excerpted: > On Thursday, August 26, 2010 13:02:15 Richard Freeman wrote: >> If there is no debate about whether OpenRC should be adopting it, then >> why is it even being discussed in this way? Let's just do it... > > people saw Roy mo

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread David Abbott
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Roy Bamford wrote: > > Will there be a new DVD? > 10.1 is about a year old already. likewhoa has been working on a new version and it is almost ready. He has run into a show stopper as nox is not working and needs some help, if anyone has the time to help him figur

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Roy Bamford
On 2010.08.26 13:07, Alex Legler wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:01:27 +0200, Markus Duft > wrote: > > > booth registration is not yet open, i will have an eye on this > too... > > (is there any interest in it anyway? who could come up with flyers, > > cds, etc.?) > > > > The Gentoo e.V. has pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of releng project

2010-08-26 Thread Ramon van Alteren
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > On 08/26/2010 10:38 AM, Ramon van Alteren wrote: > > The code is ugly and depends in most cases on an external information > > source to do the work, but given sufficient interest I'm willing to see if > > I can clean it up and make it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 13:02:15 Richard Freeman wrote: > If there is no debate about whether OpenRC should be adopting it, then > why is it even being discussed in this way? Let's just do it... there is no debate. people saw Roy moving on and got scared. as i said originally, it makes no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo

2010-08-26 Thread Richard Freeman
On 08/25/2010 08:29 PM, Duncan wrote: But that was pretty much decided some time ago, based on my following of the relevant discussions here and elsewhere, so why are you arguing a point that's not being argued any more? I believe that's what Mike's WTFing about. It's not that you're wrong, you

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of releng project

2010-08-26 Thread Luca Barbato
On 08/26/2010 10:38 AM, Ramon van Alteren wrote: > The code is ugly and depends in most cases on an external information > source to do the work, but given sufficient interest I'm willing to see if > I can clean it up and make it generic enough for general use. That would be great ^^ lu -- Luc

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Alex Legler
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:01:27 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: > booth registration is not yet open, i will have an eye on this too... > (is there any interest in it anyway? who could come up with flyers, > cds, etc.?) > The Gentoo e.V. has printed flyers a year ago. There should be plenty left, especi

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Petteri Räty
On 08/26/2010 12:01 PM, Markus Duft wrote: > On 08/26/2010 10:55 AM, Markus Duft wrote: >> On 08/26/2010 10:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >>> On 26-08-2010 10:10:49 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: I applied for a main track (regarding gentoo prefix on windows), and i wanted to ask around, if the

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 05:01:27 Markus Duft wrote: > booth registration is not yet open, i will have an eye on this too... > (is there any interest in it anyway? who could come up with flyers, cds, > etc.?) the booth is where you get non-Gentoo peeps stopping by, so yes -mike signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Markus Duft
On 08/26/2010 10:55 AM, Markus Duft wrote: > On 08/26/2010 10:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: >> On 26-08-2010 10:10:49 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: >>> I applied for a main track (regarding gentoo prefix on windows), and i >>> wanted to ask around, if there is interest in a devroom/booth/etc again >>> t

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Markus Duft
On 08/26/2010 10:33 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 26-08-2010 10:10:49 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: >> I applied for a main track (regarding gentoo prefix on windows), and i >> wanted to ask around, if there is interest in a devroom/booth/etc again >> this year (to be early enough - we missed it last

Re: [gentoo-dev] status of releng project

2010-08-26 Thread Ramon van Alteren
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 08:23:58PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote: > agaffney had started work on quickstart, which basically did what the > handbook did in an automatic fashion. i only tried it a couple of times, > but it worked rather well. > > its a small and neat piece of code. for anybody looki

Re: [gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 26-08-2010 10:10:49 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: > I applied for a main track (regarding gentoo prefix on windows), and i > wanted to ask around, if there is interest in a devroom/booth/etc again > this year (to be early enough - we missed it last year, right ;)). > > who will be attending FOSDEM

[gentoo-dev] FOSDEM 2011

2010-08-26 Thread Markus Duft
Hey! According to the FOSDEM list: "We hereby invite ideas and proposals for main speakers, and proposals for developer rooms. The call for stands and lightning talks will be done after announcing the accepted devrooms." I applied for a main track (regarding gentoo prefix on windows), and i wan