# Christian Birchinger jo...@gentoo.org (11 Sep 2010)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't work
# with recent Audacious and the included ghosd
# plugin is a perfect replacment.
media-plugins/audacious-xosd
Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:32:38 +0200 as excerpted:
If the reason you propose this is visibility, then maybe we should make
the quicksearch option include more than just open bugs. I've thought
about having UPSTREAM/DUPLICATE/INVALID added so that bugzilla users can
more
2010/9/11 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Since you guys again talk about stabling something, i added -r1 again.
This time with really trimmed patches that fixes only build time issues
or some issue i experienced localy.
Feel free to rework that patches before stabling it :)
Thanks, I've
On Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:00:50 + (UTC)
bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
Clear-Text: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142517
Secure:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 07:17:01 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:32:38 +0200 as excerpted:
If the reason you propose this is visibility, then maybe we should
make the quicksearch option include more than just open bugs. I've
thought
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
W dniu 11.09.2010 15:38, Jeroen Roovers pisze:
1) OK, we have someone anonymously using bugs.gentoo.org in an official
capacity? I don't think this is a good idea.
2) This bug was RESOLVED/FIXED 4 years ago. There is absolutely no
reason to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/08/2010 03:03 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
We already have a variety of use_*() functions with their specific
uses. But what I miss is a single, simple and universal use_echo()
function, behaving similarly to ?: operator in C. In other
On 9/11/10 11:03 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Just as a proof-of-concept, here's one implementation of such a
function, allowing for an arbitrary number of arguments:
use_echo() {
while [[ $# -gt 1 ]]; do
if use $1; then
echo $2
2010/9/11 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org
On 9/11/10 11:03 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Just as a proof-of-concept, here's one implementation of such a
function, allowing for an arbitrary number of arguments:
use_echo() {
while [[ $# -gt 1 ]]; do
if use $1;
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:26:17 +0200
Francesco R viv...@gmail.com wrote:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB ,echoC)
I would personally rather use:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB echoC)
but AFAICS your implementation should support both.
PS I suggest using [[ -z ${u} ]] instead.
--
On 09/11/2010 09:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:26:17 +0200
Francesco R viv...@gmail.com wrote:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB ,echoC)
I would personally rather use:
echo $(use_case useA,echoA useB,echoB echoC)
but AFAICS your implementation should support
Hi all,
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use it too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
you mix stable unstable - your problem
Cheers Justin
signature.asc
On 9/11/10 11:51 AM, justin wrote:
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use it too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
you mix stable unstable - your
On 09/11/2010 09:51 PM, justin wrote:
Hi all,
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use it too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
you mix stable unstable
On 09/11/2010 01:39 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
arfrever10/09/10 22:39:27
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild
Log:
Version bump.
(Portage version: 2.2_rc79_p5/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Revision
On Saturday 11 of September 2010 20:51:56 justin wrote:
Hi all,
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use it
too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35 (sys-kernel/linux-headers)
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=amd64
you
On 09/11/2010 01:02 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
arfrever10/09/10 22:02:28
Modified: PyQt4-4.7.6.ebuild ChangeLog
Log:
Update EAPI. Fix dependencies.
This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed.
(Portage version:
On 09/11/2010 12:50 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (arfrever)
wrote:
+PYTHON_CFLAGS=(2.* + -fno-strict-aliasing)
+
Shouldn't this rather be a patch to the build system that can be sent
upstream?
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
Update EAPI. Fix dependencies.
This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed.
Come on. EAPI was updated to 3, and removal of the EPREFIX assignments
are part of that.
Ulrich
On 11-09-2010 21:29:22 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
Update EAPI. Fix dependencies.
This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed.
Come on. EAPI was updated to 3, and removal of the EPREFIX assignments
are part of that.
I
On 09/11/2010 10:31 PM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 11-09-2010 21:29:22 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Petteri Räty wrote:
Update EAPI. Fix dependencies.
This message does not tell why the EPREFIX stuff was removed.
Come on. EAPI was updated to 3, and removal of the EPREFIX
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
+
+*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010)
+
+ 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org
+ -hachoir-parser-1.3.3.ebuild, +hachoir-parser-1.3.4.ebuild:
+ Version bump.
Deleting
On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
+
+*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010)
+
+ 10 Sep 2010; Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
On 09/11/2010 11:20 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Saturday 11 of September 2010 22:18:32 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:14 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:10:51 +0300
Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
+
+*hachoir-parser-1.3.4 (10 Sep 2010)
+
+ 10 Sep 2010;
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/11/2010 02:03 PM, Jonathan Callen wrote:
On 09/08/2010 03:03 PM, MichaB Górny wrote:
If called with a single arg, it would assume val1=use1.
Just as a proof-of-concept, here's one implementation of such a
function, allowing for an
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:59:25 +1200
Alistair Bush ali_b...@gentoo.org wrote:
There should be nothing stopping a user from running a mixed arch/~arch
system. Those problems just point to our dependency information not being
recorded correctly. It might be understandable that this info can
On Saturday, September 11, 2010 15:04:45 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 20:51:56 +0200 justin wrote:
is the following comment an adequate way to close bugs with
RESOLVED/INVALID? If so, I will change the way I handle bugs and use
it too.
virtual/os-headers: 2.6.35
On Saturday, September 11, 2010 22:51:23 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 20:59:25 +1200 Alistair Bush wrote:
There should be nothing stopping a user from running a mixed arch/~arch
system. Those problems just point to our dependency information not
being recorded correctly. It
28 matches
Mail list logo
