Il giorno mer, 03/11/2010 alle 18.46 -0200, Rafael Goncalves Martins ha
scritto:
>
>
> I'm just wondering if it's worth add the packages now, before create
> the new category, and have more packages to fix when creating the new
> category.
Create the category before adding the packages. pkgmove
>
> To summarize, half the categories have 10-50 packages, then there are a
> number of huge ones. If you can get at least 15 packages, it's a
> reasonable starting point for a new category.
>
I wouldn't have a limit like 15 on it. My first thought for checking Lua is
looking in /usr/portage/dev-l
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 08:09 Tue 02 Nov , "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> On 11/2/10 4:24 AM, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
>> > I think that a first step should be create a new category, maybe
>> > called dev-lua, for all the Lua related stuff.
>>
>> Just
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:41:46 +0100
Domen Kožar wrote:
> Just wondering, why did you abuse classes that badly and hack way
> through optparse? If it limits your needs you might want to take a
> look at argparse.
With classes, I hope to clean that up a little soon. My ideas changed
a little during
Just wondering, why did you abuse classes that badly and hack way
through optparse? If it limits your needs you might want to take a look
at argparse.
Domen
On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 14:48 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100
> Torsten Veller wrote:
>
> > If nobody is inte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:29:42 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> And why the heck you are not working on making it part of gentoolkit +
> equery (the same way i incorporated eshowkw).
Because I dislike the all-in-one packaging idea. Separate development
al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 3.11.2010 14:48, Michał Górny napsal(a):
> On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100
> Torsten Veller wrote:
>
>> If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
>
> If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 08:32:07 +0100
Torsten Veller wrote:
> If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
If nobody is interested indeed, I'd appreciate a longer removal period
as I'm currently working on a replacement script, called flaggie [1].
Although it can be considered w
On Wed, Nov 03, 2010 at 09:58:02AM +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 01:12 +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Nov 2010 23:59:36 +
> > Markos Chandras wrote:
> >
> > > > I noticed you've reassigned a bunch of SynCE bugs to me
> >
> > > mescalinum is being retired due
Moin,
is anybody interested to maintain the following packages?
| app-admin/config_confd
| app-portage/flagedit
| app-portage/profuse
| dev-util/libconf
If nobody is interested, I'll mask them for removal in one week.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=app-admin/config_confd,app-por
10 matches
Mail list logo
