Re: [gentoo-dev] Please move your packages to virtual/jpeg

2010-11-09 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:51:16 Jory A. Pratt wrote: As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1 release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all use virtual/jpeg we can ensure that the user has

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please move your packages to virtual/jpeg

2010-11-09 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 11/09/2010 04:29 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:51:16 Jory A. Pratt wrote: As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1 release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please move your packages to virtual/jpeg

2010-11-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday, November 07, 2010 15:47:52 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 11/07/2010 10:40 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 11/7/10 8:51 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote: As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support. We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-sound/mpfc/files: mpfc-1.3.7-INT_MAX.patch

2010-11-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, October 28, 2010 13:51:05 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto: Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the linux headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in

[gentoo-dev] Re: News item for restructuring of hardened profiles.

2010-11-09 Thread Duncan
Christian Faulhammer posted on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:51:45 +0100 as excerpted: Hi, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org: We will change the profiles one arch at a time, starting with ia64, and proceeding in order with ppc, ppc64, x86 and amd64. Once your arch has been update