On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:51:16 Jory A. Pratt wrote:
As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support.
We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1
release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all use virtual/jpeg we
can ensure that the user has
On 11/09/2010 04:29 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sunday 07 November 2010 16:51:16 Jory A. Pratt wrote:
As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support.
We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1
release that is not avaliable as of yet. If we all
On Sunday, November 07, 2010 15:47:52 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 11/07/2010 10:40 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/7/10 8:51 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
As some of you are aware libjpeg-turbo is in the tree, with v8 support.
We will not keyword for any archs until we officially add the 1.1
On Thursday, October 28, 2010 13:51:05 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 10/28/10 7:42 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Il giorno lun, 25/10/2010 alle 18.50 -0300, Alexis Ballier ha scritto:
Am I missing something obvious or is it just hiding a bug in the
linux
headers? I see no usage of INT_MAX in
Christian Faulhammer posted on Tue, 09 Nov 2010 23:51:45 +0100 as
excerpted:
Hi,
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org:
We will change the profiles one arch at a time, starting with ia64, and
proceeding in order with ppc, ppc64, x86 and amd64. Once your arch has
been update