People seem to have started using blockers with package moves recently.
For example, if cat/a is being moved to cat/b, people have started
putting !cat/a as a dependency in cat/b. This is bad, for two reasons.
First, you shouldn't have to do that. If package moves aren't working,
we've got bigger
On 1/16/11 2:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Second, when performing updates, Paludis also rewrites dependencies of
installed packages to use the names.
This seems to imply that portage behaves differently. Should we update
PMS when we determine what's the correct behavior?
signature.asc
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:05:22 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 1/16/11 2:49 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Second, when performing updates, Paludis also rewrites dependencies
of installed packages to use the names.
This seems to imply that portage behaves differently.
Hello!
I have just released genkernel 3.4.11 to the testing tree.
From a high level point of view this release brings:
- Slightly faster startup
- Updated versions of busybox, LVM, e2fsprogs/blkid
- A few new features, e.g. GnuPG support
- A bunch of bug fixes (see below)
Below you can find
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2011-01-16 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
xfce-extra/thunar-media-tags-plugin 2011-01-11 10:13:43 ssuominen
xfce-extra/thunar-vcs-plugin2011-01-11 10:13:44 ssuominen
On Sun, 16 Jan 2011 13:49:38 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
People seem to have started using blockers with package moves recently.
For example, if cat/a is being moved to cat/b, people have started
putting !cat/a as a dependency in cat/b. This is bad, for two
