Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: >> >>> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] >> >> I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific >> features) are allowed here. > > Th

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite: Some unimportant/abandoned V4Lv1 packages failing to build with linux-headers-2.6.38

2011-05-19 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen (20 May 2011) # Some abandonware that fails to build with linux-headers-2.6.38, # and other issues # # spcaview, bugs 329065, 336599, 364843 # aatv, bug 364845 # camsource, bug 365683 # effectv, bug 365255 # setpwc, bug 363469 (if saved, reopen bug 121073) # fmio, bugs 361581, 35

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Jonathan Callen schrieb am 19.05.11 um 11:49 Uhr: > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: > > > >> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] > > > > I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific > > features) are allowed here. >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Jonathan Callen
Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: > >> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] > > I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific > features) are allowed here. The GLEP does not make any meantion as to whether it is legal to use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 19 May 2011 09:15:40 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I think for a proper solution we would have to increase the number of > the News-Item-Format. Maybe even add a new header field for the EAPI. Could just use an 'eapi' file in the news directory. Although does Portage support that? -- Ci

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 19 May 2011, Alec Warner wrote: > You should file a bug about that; I'm sure one of the portage guys > can change the crap code I wrote 4 years ago to use the normal > dependency checking code for installed atoms. But we wouldn't know if users have the updated portage version instal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal of kdeprefix news item

2011-05-19 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote: > >> Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix] > > I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific > features) are allowed here. You should file a bug about that; I'm