Re: Common sense in [gentoo-dev] (was Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling)

2011-05-30 Thread Ângelo Arrifano
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 00:38:34 Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:05:03AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 23:55:52 schrieb Brian Harring: > > > If someone has a definition that is commonsense, then propose it- the > > > current "you must log everything" i

Re: Common sense in [gentoo-dev] (was Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling)

2011-05-30 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:05:03AM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 23:55:52 schrieb Brian Harring: > > If someone has a definition that is commonsense, then propose it- the > > current "you must log everything" is very, very heavy handed and > > basically was a forced situ

[gentoo-dev] Re: Common sense in (was Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling)

2011-05-30 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 31/05/2011 alle 00.05 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel ha scritto: > > Thoughts? LGTM -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Common sense in [gentoo-dev] (was Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling)

2011-05-30 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 23:55:52 schrieb Brian Harring: > If someone has a definition that is commonsense, then propose it- the > current "you must log everything" is very, very heavy handed and > basically was a forced situation since QA cannot make folks behave > when the rules are reliant on comm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

2011-05-30 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:03:42PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 20/05/2011 в 13:19 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: > > On T, 2011-05-17 at 13:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110510-summary.txt > > > > > > Please note that you must now upd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

2011-05-30 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 02:23:09PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The council should also clarify how to treat the ChangeLog in case of > package removals. The devmanual requires that it is updated even in > this case, whereas the handbook says that all files should be removed. IMHO this is a case

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

2011-05-30 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 30 May 2011 16:03:42 +0400 Peter Volkov wrote: > В Птн, 20/05/2011 в 13:19 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: > > On T, 2011-05-17 at 13:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110510-summary.txt > > > > > > Please note that you must now update C

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/spiralmodular

2011-05-30 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (30 May 2011) # Broken ebuild. Bug #351697 # - uses symlinked automake files; # - doesn't provide autotools files to regen; # - does not respect jobserver # Masked for removal in 30 days media-sound/spiralmodular - -- Markos Chan

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-p2p/hrktorrent

2011-05-30 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras (30 May 2011) # Does not build against gcc-4.5.2. Requires obsolete # net-libs/rb_libtorrent-0.14.* which does not build # against python-2.7. Alternatives: net-p2p/rtorrent # Masked for removal in 30 days net-p2p/hrktorrent - --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

2011-05-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Peter Volkov wrote: > So, I just realized that we have to update Changelogs for > everything, whitespaces and comments included. Even after reading > meeting logs I still wonder, why council have decided to vote policy > change that was not supported even by minority of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Council May Summary: Changes to ChangeLog handling

2011-05-30 Thread Peter Volkov
В Птн, 20/05/2011 в 13:19 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: > On T, 2011-05-17 at 13:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20110510-summary.txt > > > > Please note that you must now update ChangeLog with each commit. For > > more information please see the

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?

2011-05-30 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno lun, 30/05/2011 alle 13.21 +0200, Ulrich Mueller ha scritto: > > But it is not compliant with PMS: > "If S is assigned in the global scope of an ebuild, then the > restrictions of section 12.2 for global variables apply." (section > 12.1) > "Global variables must only contain invariant v

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?

2011-05-30 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 30 May 2011, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > Il giorno lun, 30/05/2011 alle 08.27 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto: >> S="${WORKDIR}/solutious-${PN}-*" >> >> I'm surprised if that actually works. I'd say that seems not >> PMS-compliant but in fact PMS seems to almost not mention S. > Bec

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?

2011-05-30 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno lun, 30/05/2011 alle 08.27 +0200, Michał Górny ha scritto: > > S="${WORKDIR}/solutious-${PN}-*" > > I'm surprised if that actually works. I'd say that seems not > PMS-compliant but in fact PMS seems to almost not mention S. Because you didn't follow the whole eclass tree ;) ruby-ng h