Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-14 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:08:54AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Brian Harring wrote: > > The implicit system set dependency thing really, really needs to die; > > at the time of the rule, portage couldn't handle resolving graphs of > > that sort. ?PM resolvers for

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/signature

2011-06-14 Thread Eray Aslan
# Eray Aslan (14 Jun 2011) # Last release in 2000. Possible buffer overflow - bug #349786. # Alternative net-mail/signify but better still most mail # clients provide this service now. # Removal in 30 days net-mail/signature -- Eray Aslan Developer, Gentoo Linux eras gentoo.org pgpKkasW

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/vm-pop3d

2011-06-14 Thread Eray Aslan
# Eray Aslan (14 Jun 2011) # Dead upstream. Does not work properly - bug #179497 #370145. # Several good alternatives, including dovecot, cyrus, mailutils. # Removal in 30 days net-mail/vm-pop3d -- Eray Aslan Developer, Gentoo Linux eras gentoo.org pgpQaNUw77DfL.pgp Description: PGP sig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Brian Harring wrote: > The implicit system set dependency thing really, really needs to die; > at the time of the rule, portage couldn't handle resolving graphs of > that sort.  PM resolvers for gentoo are generally a fair bit saner > now thus doing what you're sug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-14 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 06/14/2011 03:54 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:41:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:14:06AM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >>> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:58:56 +0200 >>> Jeroen Roovers wrote: >>> Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebui

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that explicitly DEPEND on sys-apps/sed

2011-06-14 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 11:41:54PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 06:14:06AM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:58:56 +0200 > > Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > > > > Judging from [1], a couple of thousands of ebuilds DEPEND on > > > sys-apps/sed, which is a s