On Thu, 3 Nov 2011 01:33:38 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear all,
2) I'd like to suggest that for changelogs that grow beyond a
certain size (e.g. profiles/ChangeLog) the file is rotated
similar to /var/log logfiles. I.e. the current file is renamed with
a date
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
The old entries file ChangeLog-2010 will be identical to the
current ChangeLog file except for skipping at the start all entries
added later than 31/12/2010.
Just to make sure that I understand it: Does this imply that the old
entries file will
On 11/03/2011 01:33 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
In a week's time I personally, manually, will rotate all ChangeLog files
larger than 100k in the tree, by splitting them at 31/12/2010-1/1/2011.
Opinions, flames, ...?
opinion
Again for 'emerge --changelog':
As we do have the $delay before
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 09:24:07 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
The old entries file ChangeLog-2010 will be identical to the
current ChangeLog file except for skipping at the start all entries
added later than 31/12/2010.
Just to make sure that
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 10:16:53 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Again for 'emerge --changelog':
As we do have the $delay before breaking old period, usually with
$delay=1 year: Should we also apply this $delay to the output of above
command?
If yes, what I can think of ATM is:
* Do
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 09:09:19 Michał Górny wrote:
Maybe we should keep old changelogs in a separate directory to decrease
ebuilddir pollution?
Not sure about that.
The new ChangeLog file will be identical to the current ChangeLog
file except for being truncated at 1/1/2011.
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 10:16:53 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
As we do have the $delay before breaking old period, usually with
$delay=1 year: Should we also apply this $delay to the output of
above command?
Makes all perfect sense...
Shouldn't portage offer some means to recover from a corrupted vdb?
I just stumbled upon
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-900382-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html
and it seems really bad.
It would suck if the only solution to this is reinstall (I remember
package database
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think we can't salvage much from a corrupted db (anything can happen,
and the reporter mentions some code being present in the files), but at
least emerge -e world or equivalent should be possible.
I'm not sure
On Nov 3, 2011 10:25 a.m., Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 09:09:19 Michał Górny wrote:
Maybe we should keep old changelogs in a separate directory to decrease
ebuilddir pollution?
Not sure about that.
Thank you for this infusion of
On 11/03/2011 04:15 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
Shouldn't portage offer some means to recover from a corrupted vdb?
I just stumbled upon
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-900382-start-0-postdays-0-postorder-asc-highlight-.html
and it seems really bad.
It would suck if the only
http://sources.gentoo.org/eclass/user.eclass?r1=1.8r2=1.9
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
Am 02.11.2011 17:11, schrieb Robin H. Johnson:
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 01:03:21PM +0100, enno+gen...@groeper-berlin.de wrote:
I followed the threads about manifest signing with interest and even had
a look at the manifest signing guide [4]. Sounds nice at first view.
But, please correct
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 10:55:52PM +0100, enno+gen...@groeper-berlin.de wrote:
If it is (also) for the users, why is there no code for it in portage
anymore [3]?
Hmm, I hadn't see that removal, but it makes sense unless the entire
tree is developer-signed, which isn't likely to happen
1) Why is there no ChangeLog in the eclass directory?
In my personal opinion this is missing there, if only for historical
reasons... Should we still start one?
as there was only positive feedback to this suggestion, I'll create a
ChangeLog file in the eclass directory during the next
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 11:59:55 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 3 Nov 2011, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
On Donnerstag 03 November 2011 10:16:53 Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
As we do have the $delay before breaking old period, usually with
$delay=1 year: Should we also apply this $delay
16 matches
Mail list logo
