Due rbu retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
net-libs/libmrss
net-libs/libnxml
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
app-text/pdfshuffler
dev-util/lafilefixer
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Due chiiph retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
dev-util/dissy
net-misc/axel
net-misc/vidalia
Thanks for taking them
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
app-portage/autounmask
app-portage/demerge
Ian, if you want to completely remove yourself from maintaining any
package, please told us so.
Thanks for taking them
Sounds like a sane change.
--
Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org
Gentoo
net-misc/axel
Mine now.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
dev-util/lafilefixer
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed?
I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with
other maintainers who don't respond.
I don't know if any of the packages is really good to be stabilized.
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
the plans are for that.
Rich
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
dev-util/lafilefixer
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
I believe it
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
app-text/pdfshuffler
I'll take this one
Andrey
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99016 ian doesn't
have commit access and, then, his packages need a proxy maintainer:
app-portage/autounmask
app-portage/demerge
I would volunteer to proxy maintain these packages, if Christian still
wants
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/11/11 10:17 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/23/11 3:27 PM, Torsten Veller wrote:
What do you expect to happen with bugs assigned to maintainer-needed?
I'm going to CC arches myself after a while, similarly as with bugs with
other
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 17:14 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 07:37 -0800, Brian Dolbec escribió:
On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:47 +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 11/24/11 1:38 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due loki_val retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
.should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?*
(* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else
that needs to go stable)
I support stabilizing bug-free newer versions of
El jue, 24-11-2011 a las 12:12 -0500, Rich Freeman escribió:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
.should ~arch packages with no maintainer really be moved to stable?*
(* assuming no other outside forces, like it's a dep of something else
that needs to
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:14:01 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also maybe it could still be needed by people using other package
manager (but I am a portage user and don't know how these problems are
solved in pkgcore/paludis :-/)
Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it
On 11/24/2011 07:56 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Due chiiph retirement the following packages need a new maintainer:
dev-util/dissy
net-misc/axel
net-misc/vidalia
Thanks for taking them
Since I'm taking care of net-misc/tor, I'll take net-misc/vidali.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Paludis doesn't want you to run lafilefixer since it breaks VDB, and
won't integrate any functionality along these lines unless it's EAPI
controlled and well specified.
IIUC, Portage fixes libtool archives after the src_install phase but
before
On 11/24/2011 07:34 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Do we still need lafilefixer? I think it's been integrated into portage,
right?
Not until it is stabilized and made the default. I'm not sure what
the plans are for
we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
anyone intrested is free to join)
it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
to use thesedays:
$ grep -r herd.*ayatana */*/metadata.xml
dev-libs/libappindicator/metadata.xml: herdayatana/herd
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
anyone intrested is free to join)
it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
to use thesedays:
Very nice. I have been working on some ubuntuone and unity ebuilds, if
On 11/24/2011 10:10 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
anyone intrested is free to join)
it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
to use thesedays:
Very nice.
On 11/24/2011 08:57 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
we have a new herd called ayatana (i'm currently the only member, but
anyone intrested is free to join)
it's aimed at maintaining the ubuntu -invented libraries many apps tend
to use thesedays:
$ grep -r herd.*ayatana */*/metadata.xml
24 matches
Mail list logo
