El dom, 04-12-2011 a las 17:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger escribió:
On Sunday 04 December 2011 15:35:50 Sven Vermeulen wrote:
Since there are quite a few packages that would need updates, I thought
about first mailing gentoo-dev for feedback and perhaps a first chunk of
work done. I also
Seriously, what do we gain from crawlers accessing sources.gentoo.org? I cant
really remember seeing it once in a google query result...
Possibly it would not even be required to deny all requests, but just deny
everything related to ancient history...
Hello,
For a while
On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:10:19 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
In this particular case the approved PMS says In the pkg phases, at
least one of the following conditions must be met: any command
provided by a packaged listed in DEPEND is available; any command
provided by a packaged
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:48 AM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Seriously, what do we gain from crawlers accessing sources.gentoo.org? I cant
really remember seeing it once in a google query result...
We want the site searchable.
Possibly it would not even be required to
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:54:13AM +0100, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
In Gentoo, unlike some other distributions, we try to keep the number of
loaded/installed modules to a minimum so that policy rebuilds as well as the
system overhead is limited. This results in a base policy (provided by
Rich Freeman schrieb:
Can we just translate the error messages?
That seems pretty impractical to me. Google Translate is about your
only option here,
Actually the translation already exists in /usr/share/locale/ and just
needs to be looked up, so it appears not entirely impractical. Still,
Alec Warner schrieb:
Seriously, what do we gain from crawlers accessing sources.gentoo.org? I
cant
really remember seeing it once in a google query result...
We want the site searchable.
The majority of the expensive requests are related to package.mask and
use.local.desc queries by
