Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/21/12 11:14, Justin wrote: > On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: >>> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in other contexts without permission of the author. >> >>> Po

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Justin schrieb am 21.03.12 um 16:14 Uhr: > On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > >> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: > >>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for > >>> use in other contexts without permission of the aut

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 3/21/12 3:18 PM, Justin wrote: > http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do Have you suggested the authors to use a more standard license? A good article about that (and more) is That could also address possible interpretation q

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Justin schrieb: > Hi, > > I need some comments on following License Agreement: > > http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do > > QUOTE > > In downloading this code you agree with the following: This would maybe warrant fetch restriction or inclusion of the license in the EULA group, as ag

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: >> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in >> other contexts without permission of the author. > > Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts. Unless portage is just

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Justin
On 21.03.2012 15:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: >>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for >>> use in other contexts without permission of the author. > >> Portage could be considered to be one of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 15:18 +0100, Justin wrote: > Hi, > > I need some comments on following License Agreement: > > http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do > > QUOTE > > In downloading this code you agree with the following: > > I will not redistribute the software to others outside of m

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/21/12 10:48, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: >> On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: >>> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for >>> use in other contexts without permission of the author. > >> Portage could be considered to be one of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 21/03/12 10:34 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: >> I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for >> use in other contexts without permission of the author. > > Portage could be considered to be one of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/21/12 10:18, Justin wrote: > I will not extract part of the software, e.g. subroutines, for use in > other contexts without permission of the author. Portage could be considered to be one of these contexts. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Kent Fredric
On 22 March 2012 03:18, Justin wrote: > Hi, > > I need some comments on following License Agreement: > > http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do > > QUOTE > > In downloading this code you agree with the following: > > I will not redistribute the software to others outside of my immediat

[gentoo-dev] RFC: License problem

2012-03-21 Thread Justin
Hi, I need some comments on following License Agreement: http://fizz.cmp.uea.ac.uk/dyndom/dyndomDownload.do QUOTE In downloading this code you agree with the following: I will not redistribute the software to others outside of my immediate research group. I will suggest to other interested res

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 03/21/2012 07:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: www-servers/thttpd I can take care of this one -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 8040 5A4D 8709 21B1 1A88 33CE 979C AF40 D045 5535 GnuPG ID : D0455535

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Alex Alexander
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:26:12PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: ... > www-servers/lighttpd This is not an orphan

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:26 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > > to maintain. This is the list of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 03/21/12 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: > www-servers/pound > www-servers/varnish I'm a gonna take those two

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mié, 21-03-2012 a las 12:26 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió: > As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, > we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want > to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: [...] > www-servers/bozohttpd [...] This is a fal

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due www-server herd removal

2012-03-21 Thread Pacho Ramos
As discussed in "[gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty" thread, we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages: www-servers/boa www-servers/bozohttpd www-servers/cherokee www-servers/fnord www-servers/lighttpd www-servers/mini_h

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty

2012-03-21 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:47, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> I find the whole concept of www-servers herd flawed. >> It's not very likely one person would be running many different servers, >> and thus be able to contribute to them. >> >> Propably why the team has no members in the first place... > > Then

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty

2012-03-21 Thread Ultrabug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/03/2012 10:47, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El mar, 20-03-2012 a las 11:40 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió: >> On 03/20/2012 11:36 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> El lun, 19-03-2012 a las 20:48 +, Markos Chandras >>> escribió: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED