[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread Samuli Suominen
ChangeLog? On 05/20/2012 01:26 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier 12/05/20 10:26:05 Modified: autotools.eclass Log: automatically create AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR dir too Revision ChangesPath 1.131eclass/autotools.eclass file :

[gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass:eautoreconf now runs autopoint for you

2012-05-20 Thread Mike Frysinger
i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the package uses gettext. the configure check might seem naïve, but this is how autoreconf itself does it. this hopefully shouldn't break any packages (at least, none that weren't already broken), but if you guys start seeing

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread Samuli Suominen
ChangeLog again. On 05/20/2012 01:39 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier 12/05/20 10:39:45 Modified: autotools.eclass Log: always depend on automake even when WANT_AUTOMAKE=none #401605 Revision ChangesPath 1.133eclass/autotools.eclass

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: git-2.eclass fetching from multiple repos

2012-05-20 Thread Steven J Long
Michał Górny wrote: Sometimes it is necessary for a single package to pull from multiple remote repositories. snip Another question is how to implement it API-wide. The main problem here is that we already use multiple values for EGIT_REPO_URI to support fallback URIs, and I'd prefer

Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass:eautoreconf now runs autopoint for you

2012-05-20 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i've extended eautoreconf to automatically call autopoint when the package uses gettext.  the configure check might seem naïve, but this is how autoreconf itself does it.  this hopefully shouldn't break any packages (at

[gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)

2012-05-20 Thread Samuli Suominen
ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today. On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier 12/05/20 12:31:33 Modified: autotools.eclass Log: we don't use anything from eutils eclass now, so drop the inherit Revision

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)

2012-05-20 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today. I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)

2012-05-20 Thread Nirbheek Chauhan
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today. I will repeat once again: autogenerate them. +1 for this,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)

2012-05-20 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag 20 Mai 2012, 15:30:45 schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog (was: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: autotools.eclass)

2012-05-20 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every autotools.eclass modification today. I'm sure spankman would make them if his tools did it for him, RIGHT SPANK? -A On 05/20/2012 03:31 PM, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier

[gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, In today's MythBusters™: do we actually need the whole ugly-awful mangling games.eclass does for games? By that I mean: - installing games in random pre-/postfixes rather than standard FHS-y locations, - changing ownership and permissions of all the files. Do we really need all of this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Fabio Erculiani
I second that. simplicity = win. -- Fabio Erculiani

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: - changing ownership and permissions of all the files. As a side note: why is /usr/games owned by uid games? Does games_pkg_setup() in games.eclass do that? What's the point of user games (as opposed to group with same name)?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Dan Douglas
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 06:26:17 PM Michał Górny wrote: Do we really need all of this poor man's 'you shall not play our games'? I don't think we're using anything like /usr/office office group, or /usr/random-programs-i-dont-like. I'd put money on there not being a single admin who has ever

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Marien Zwart
+1 on getting rid of the munging. In my opinion games aren't nearly special enough to get this kind of special treatment. On zo, 2012-05-20 at 20:16 +0300, Maxim Kammerer wrote: Games are rather unique in that they sometimes keep scores across multiple users. Yes, and that's frequently handled

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/20/2012 07:22 PM, Dan Douglas wrote: I'd put money on there not being a single admin who has ever used the games group to control access to games. Games really have no business being on a system where anything like that is a requirement

[gentoo-dev] Lastrite ~app-text/kiwix-0.9_beta5 (for using vulnerable copy of net-libs/xulrunner)

2012-05-20 Thread Samuli Suominen
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (20 May 2012) # Still using vulnerable net-libs/xulrunner wrt bug 412341 # Build problems wrt bug 390325 # Version 0.9_beta5 will be removed in approx. 30 days ~app-text/kiwix-0.9_beta5

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do we need games group and all that game prefixes?

2012-05-20 Thread Dan Douglas
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:29:28 PM Michael Weber wrote: On 05/20/2012 07:22 PM, Dan Douglas wrote: I'd put money on there not being a single admin who has ever used the games group to control access to games. Games really have no business being on a system where anything like that is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Remove eclass/ChangeLog

2012-05-20 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/20/2012 02:30 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 20 May 2012 15:33:11 +0300 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: ChangeLog entries missing for every

[gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread hasufell
I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just pixmaps. proposal attached + diff This should not break existing ebuilds. Tested a bit and open for review now. # @FUNCTION: doicon # @USAGE: doicon [options] icons #

Re: [gentoo-dev] enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread hasufell
On 05/21/2012 01:36 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories which are under /usr/share/icons/... and not just pixmaps. proposal attached + diff This should not

[gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread Jonathan Callen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 05/20/2012 07:49 PM, hasufell wrote: On 05/21/2012 01:36 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories which are under

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2012-05-20 23h59 UTC

2012-05-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-05-20 23h59 UTC. Removals: app-pda/libopensync-plugin-google-calendar 2012-05-16 01:19:15 ssuominen x11-misc/see2012-05-16 06:36:39

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: enhancement for doicon/newicon in eutils.eclass

2012-05-20 Thread hasufell
On 05/21/2012 02:01 AM, Jonathan Callen wrote: On 05/20/2012 07:49 PM, hasufell wrote: On 05/21/2012 01:36 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: On Mon, 21 May 2012 01:24:13 +0200 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I want support for installing icons into the appropriate directories which are under