Hi all,
I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
should:
dev-util/perf
app-text/libxmlpatch
sys-power/apcupsd (still looking at it from base-system)
sys-apps/lomoco
net-misc/tsclient
On 23 June 2012 22:45, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 14:40 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
I'd like to know why using USE flags until a nicer solution is
available is sufficiently terrible that it warrants a hackaround.
remember qt3/qt4, gtk/gtk2. We
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 21:37:11 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:36:14 +0200
Marien Zwart mari...@gentoo.org wrote:
On za, 2012-06-23 at 17:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Is it that Paludis installs a newer SLOT even if a reverse
On 24 June 2012 02:32, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2012 13:37:59 Michael Palimaka wrote:
+for x in ${LANGS}; do
+ IUSE+= linguas_${x}
+done
if you don't want to make it into an array:
IUSE+= $(printf 'linguas_%s ' ${LANGS})
-mike
What's wrong with the
On 24 June 2012 01:57, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:37:59 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
--- cmake-utils.eclass
+++ cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -20,0 +21,29 @@
+# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: LANGS
Please prefix.
+# @DEFAULT_UNSET
+# @DESCRIPTION:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 16:34:55 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24 June 2012 01:57, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 03:37:59 +1000
Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
--- cmake-utils.eclass
+++ cmake-utils.eclass
@@ -20,0 +21,29 @@
+#
On 24 June 2012 06:50, Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org wrote:
Le samedi 23 juin 2012 à 18:30 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will treat the gtk3
version or the jruby version as being newer versions of the gtk2
version or the ruby 1.8
On 06/24/2012 10:07 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
I don't see what the problem is now. We have slots, usedeps and
required_use. Why would we need to avoid using gtk2/gtk3 useflags?
We of the Qt team are expecting Qt5 to enter the tree within the
next few months, and I'm not expecting any trouble
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 22:49:30 -0500
Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 14:40:50 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:33:47 +0200
Gilles
Just to remember everyone what gnome team actually tried to achieve to
reduce any pain from users or devs alike with gnome3 work:
* have libs slotted when possible (to the extent of manpower
available), so gtk USE flag means gtk, whatever slot is needed by the
package using it,
* have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/24/2012 12:11 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Just to remember everyone what gnome team actually tried to
achieve to reduce any pain from users or devs alike with gnome3
work: * have libs slotted when possible (to the extent of manpower
Hi,
as no packages I am interested in depend on net-libs/libmicrohttpd any
more, I plan to remove myself from maintainers.
You are welcome to take over the package. Else it will become
maintainer-needed in a couple of days.
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
So now that you've stated the problem, maybe it's a good time to find
a proper solution for it.
That isn't the problem. That's an example of an effect of the problem.
The problem is that -r and
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:58:07 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
So now that you've stated the problem, maybe it's a good time to
find a proper solution for it.
On 06/24/2012 06:55 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Hi,
as no packages I am interested in depend on net-libs/libmicrohttpd any
more, I plan to remove myself from maintainers.
You are welcome to take over the package. Else it will become
maintainer-needed in a couple of days.
Best
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:21:01 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 11:58:07 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 10:19:19 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Think || ( a:3 a:2 ).
So now that you've
Zac Medico posted on Sat, 23 Jun 2012 16:30:53 -0700 as excerpted:
On 06/16/2012 02:56 PM, Duncan wrote:
Meanwhile, one coming solution to this, in portage 2.2 anyway, is sets.
Unfortunately, it has begun to look like sets are where baselayout2 and
openrc were for many years, forever coming,
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can take care of it if no one else wants it.
Just a comment: it's a great tool with responsive upstream (they just
added SOCK_CLOEXEC support because I asked for it).
--
Maxim Kammerer
Liberté Linux:
On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between
qt4-r2 and cmake-utils eclasses, why not put this into a
On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having
code duplication. So instead of this duplication of
On 2012-06-24 18:48, Michał Górny wrote:
Of course, another question is whether LINGUAS does actually benefit
users. If compiling another .po files takes a lot of time, probably
yes. If it doesn't, I would think about getting rid of that and just
installing everything. Additional removal can be
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:23:17 +0800
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote:
We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to
see a linguas.eclass happen, because
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:12:04 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 17:20:23 +0300
Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote:
The 'standard' behaviour (which can be changed by the user) for
Paludis when doing complete resolutions is that whenever there's
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2012-06-24 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
sec-policy/selinux-acpi 2012-06-18 19:19:07 swift
sec-policy/selinux-audio-entropyd 2012-06-18 19:19:20 swift
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
advice on how to make this as smooth as possible.
My main concern is that many people
On 06/25/2012 12:15 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
advice on how to make this as smooth as
26 matches
Mail list logo
