On 27/06/2012 16:33, Michał Górny wrote:
Is the development version running somewhere already so we could play
with it a bit?
For now is not available unfortunately :( We'll try to set it up!
Thank you everybody for your feedback! The RSS feed is already
implemented globally, we'll just tweak
On 28 June 2012 13:03, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org writes:
Hi all,
I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
should:
dev-util/perf
I take this one.
Regards,
pgprI0AlBjP3H.pgp
Description: PGP
On 2012-06-27 17:51, Federico fox Scrinzi wrote:
Hi everybody!
I'm working on a GSoC project for enhancing Euscan
(http://euscan.iksaif.net/). Euscan allows to check if a given
package/ebuild has new upstream versions or not. It uses different
heuristic to scan upstream and grab new versions
I'd like to see the information regarding current tree state updated
more regularly than the full upstream scan. Especially when looking at
the herd view, it can be hard to keep track of which bumps have already
been completed.
Good idea- it should be much cheaper to do the tree update than
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 11:29:49 +0200
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
- - a Report problem machanism.
i.e. on http://euscan.iksaif.net/maintainers/48/ there's an
inconsistency between both upstream and version in gentoo
being 2012.2.0 but there's still a light red marker.
And in
El jue, 28-06-2012 a las 10:26 +0200, Michał Górny escribió:
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1].
Define 'perfect'.
To clarify:
Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain
I was doing a fresh Gentoo install today, following the manual, and it
appeared to me that the manual suggests to install a logger and a
cron, and gives some defacto suggestions.
However, the available packages that provide this facility(s) are not
overly obvious from a portage standpoint.
The
On 27 June 2012 19:51, Federico fox Scrinzi fo...@anche.no wrote:
The main question is: what would you like to have on this dashboard?
Currently (in the development version) there's the possibility to login
and watch/unwatch packages/categories/herds/... and see the watched
stuff in the
On Thursday 28 June 2012 04:22:22 Naohiro Aota wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org writes:
I'm going to give up maintainership of a few packages simply because I'm
not using it any longer and thus I can't care about them as much as I
should:
dev-util/perf
I take this one.
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote:
Mike Gilbert posted on Mon, 25 Jun 2012 23:13:09 -0400 as excerpted:
Profiles do not set a default bootloader so I have no idea what you
are talking about.
I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that was
a part of
On Monday 25 June 2012 00:15:59 Mike Gilbert wrote:
An official release of grub-2.00 should be coming pretty soon. I would
like to keyword this for ~amd64 and ~x86 shortly after it hits the tree.
I don't do much work on base system packages, so I would like some
advice on how to make this as
On Sunday 24 June 2012 04:18:07 Ben de Groot wrote:
On 24 June 2012 02:32, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 23 June 2012 13:37:59 Michael Palimaka wrote:
+for x in ${LANGS}; do
+ IUSE+= linguas_${x}
+done
if you don't want to make it into an array:
IUSE+=
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 16:39:42 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Richard Yao wrote:
Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
Sorry for a possibly ignorant question. Does multilib support include
the ability to build Busybox against uclibc (on a glibc system)?
i'm not
On Wednesday 20 June 2012 16:25:30 Richard Yao wrote:
Multilib (and/or multiarch) support
Thomas already has multilib documents put together for review. multiarch
doesn't make sense for us, and even if it did, there's no way it'd be spec-ed
out in a reasonable time frame for EAPI=5 (or even 6
On Thursday 21 June 2012 08:11:27 Homer Parker wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
In case you're not aware, the first time Gentoo did multilib, it was
done as a series of random changes to Portage that no-one really
thought through or understood. As you can
On Thursday 21 June 2012 03:00:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
In case you're not aware, the first time Gentoo did multilib, it was
done as a series of random changes to Portage that no-one really
thought through or understood. As you can see, that didn't work...
yes yes, it's very easy to throw
Kent Fredric posted on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 14:07:58 +1200 as excerpted:
For the most part it seems to get upstream / portage versioning right,
but occasionally you get miss-matches for some reason.
It would be nice to allow to provide some mapping mechanism that existed
on the overlay itself
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 23:27:06 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/20/2012 06:19 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 22:46:26 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/15/2012 06:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2012 03:44:14 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 06/13/2012 06:02 AM, Mike
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 23:59:02 Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2012 17:35:00 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:02:40 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
i've noticed a growing trend where people put setup
Mike Frysinger posted on Fri, 29 Jun 2012 01:12:38 -0400 as excerpted:
On Tuesday 26 June 2012 00:04:35 Duncan wrote:
I could have sworn there was a virtual/bootloader or some such, that
was a part of @system and that thus would have likely had a default in
the profiles packages file, but
21 matches
Mail list logo
