On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
A lot of (inheriting eclasses and) packages depend on features
provided by base.eclass (e.g., PATCHES), which are pretty neat and
which I would sorely miss. So I would certainly object to deprecating
base.eclass,
On 07/08/2012 11:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like just to receive a short clarification about the 'status' of
base.eclass: Is this eclass expected to be available everywhere, i.e.
should each eclass make sure it
On Mon, 09 Jul 2012 11:21:21 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
yet base.eclass supports arguments for base_src_install passed to
'make install'
and council voted against moving this to the PM
so what ciaranm said is very true, people just refuse to let it
become useless
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 08:39:38 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 17:35:08 -0400
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 22:10:02 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/09/2012 08:45 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:40:29 +0200 Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag 08 Juli 2012, 22:10:02 schrieb Michał Górny:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 19:49:25 +0200
René Neumann
After a little discussion in bug 425016 [1], I did an experiment.
I created a fresh Gentoo install, set the profile to desktop/kde, and
tried to emerge chromium and kde-meta.
The immediate response was for portage to suggest setting -u and -N
due to conflicts.
So, I tried emerge -puDNv
Rich Freeman wrote:
It also seems like the current portage output is giving the user some
contradictory and counterproductive advice. It seems like there are
really only two possible choices
1. The user could choose to not install chromium.
2. The user could enable icu for qt-webkit.
Do
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
It also seems like the current portage output is giving the user some
contradictory and counterproductive advice. It seems like there are
really only two possible choices
1. The user could choose to not
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
It also seems like the current portage output is giving the user some
contradictory and counterproductive advice. It seems like there
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
It shouldn't require *too* much modification to automate what you're
trying to test. I intend to modify it to work in chroot environments,
as a prelude to some build-related bug reports I'm sitting on.
Thanks - seems useful
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Thanks - seems useful in general. Not sure I'll use it for this - a
chroot should be adequate to test this (I don't intend to actually run
KDE), and is much more efficient with CPU/RAM/etc.
Liberté Linux build scripts do a
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
Pacho Ramospa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I thought it has a replacement, if not, ok to keep
It has a replacement for probably 95% of its users; hopefully Robin
and Anthony can figure out why those 5% (random number of course) is
not able to use tftp-hpa; once we do
On Monday 09 July 2012 23:41:06 you wrote:
The main question is: what would you like to have on this dashboard?
Currently (in the development version) there's the possibility to login
and watch/unwatch packages/categories/herds/... and see the watched
stuff in the account dashboard. We're
On 07/09/2012 07:02 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Is there any way for portage to figure out that one of those is the
eventual outcome, and then direct the user to the minimal changes to
accomplish either?
You could try a larger emerge --backtrack setting. If it doesn't settle
on a sensible
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll test it out on a fresh install, but that will take a number of
hours
If I install chromium first, I get the following messages when I try
to install kde-meta:
The following USE changes are necessary to proceed:
On 07/09/2012 05:42 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll test it out on a fresh install, but that will take a number of
hours
If I install chromium first, I get the following messages when I try
to install kde-meta:
The
On 07/09/2012 05:58 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 07/09/2012 05:42 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'll test it out on a fresh install, but that will take a number of
hours
If I install chromium first, I get the following messages when
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Not unless the --complete-graph option is enabled. What I'd like to do
is to automatically enable --complete-graph mode whenever the USE of an
installed package would change. It would be like that
--complete-graph-if-new-ver
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:04:15 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I proposed to have an 'integration' between euscan and pybugz.
Sounds superficially like a giant security hole / spam gateway. What
kind of integration are we talking about?
In this manner everyone can file a version
On 10 July 2012 13:28, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 00:04:15 +0200
Agostino Sarubbo a...@gentoo.org wrote:
I proposed to have an 'integration' between euscan and pybugz.
Sounds superficially like a giant security hole / spam gateway. What
kind of integration are
On 07/09/2012 06:11 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
Not unless the --complete-graph option is enabled. What I'd like to do
is to automatically enable --complete-graph mode whenever the USE of an
installed package would change. It
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:56 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
I don't have a copy of the message but when I got the update to
qt-webkit the message was fairly cryptic when it added the !icu?
dependency on
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
There have already been users on the forums with that very confusion of
what to do with the cryptic [!icu?]. And there are currently many
forum threads involving the icu use flag, qt-webkit,...
Yup, this issue hit anybody
26 matches
Mail list logo
