Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting EAPI 5 *use.stable.mask to work in gx86?

2012-12-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:25 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/11/2012 01:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:35:07 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/10/2012 01:27 PM, Michał Górny wrote: 1) duplicate most of the major profiles. Make an EAPI

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting EAPI 5 *use.stable.mask to work in gx86?

2012-12-12 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/12/2012 01:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:44:25 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/11/2012 01:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 22:35:07 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/10/2012 01:27 PM, Michał Górny wrote: 1) duplicate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-12 Thread Wolfram Schlich
Hey Jesus! * Jesus Rivero (Neurogeek) neurog...@gentoo.org [2012-12-01 15:43]: On Dec 1, 2012 5:01 AM, Wolfram Schlich wschl...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi! Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of interest:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-12 Thread Wolfram Schlich
* Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu [2012-12-01 21:31]: On 01/12/2012 01:59, Wolfram Schlich wrote: - RAID controller utils: Maybe we should add sysadmin herd as fallback for these? +1 from me. Anyone from the sysadmin herd speaking up (for or against it)? :) sys-block/hpacucli

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-12 Thread Matthew Thode
On 12/01/2012 03:59 AM, Wolfram Schlich wrote: Hi! Feel free to take care of the following packages that I used to maintain a while ago but don't anymore due to change of interest: - RAID controller utils: sys-block/afacli (older Adaptec) sys-block/dellmgr (older Dell-branded

[gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
Hello, these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package installs files based on useflags, and it comes in stable, testing and hardmasked versions, plus it has some useflag changes between versions. With

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:07:09 +0100 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package installs files based on useflags, and it comes in stable, testing and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:07:09 +0100 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: these days I am working on a puppet module for portage. For testing I have created a dummy package which can be found here [1]. The package

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:17:32 +0100 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:07:09 +0100 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: these days I am working on a puppet module for portage.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 12/12/2012 19:07, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: It would be preferred to move that package in tree though. I don't like it. Please use an overlay to test this kind of stuff, thanks. -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org wrote: If there are more dummy packages then a separate category seems good idea (and thanks for that), but if mine is the only case then i don't see a reason for that I'd prefer to not see a bunch of these, but having a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Permission to add a dummy package in tree

2012-12-12 Thread Theo Chatzimichos
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 12/12/2012 19:07, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: It would be preferred to move that package in tree though. I don't like it. Please use an overlay to test this kind of stuff, thanks. Thank you all for the feedback,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-12 Thread Michael Weber
On 12/12/2012 06:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: I'll take net-misc/radvd Welcome, co-maintainer ;-) -- Michael Weber Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Some packages up for grabs

2012-12-12 Thread Matthew Thode
On 12/12/2012 05:54 PM, Michael Weber wrote: On 12/12/2012 06:21 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: I'll take net-misc/radvd Welcome, co-maintainer ;-) ya, I say you in the metadata :P -- -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature