Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-08 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Mike Gilbert schrieb: After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX, XATTR_PAX, both or neither markings depending on kernel configuration, filesystem and mount options. I'd say that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-08 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Mike Gilbert schrieb: After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no longer has a || die. This means that the resulting binaries may have PT_PAX, XATTR_PAX, both or neither

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-08 Thread Michael Haubenwallner
On 04/08/2013 12:08 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: On 04/07/2013 05:20 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello All, After recent changes in dev-lang/v8 and related ebuilds, the pax-mark call no longer has a ||

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automagic pax-mark

2013-04-08 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org wrote: Actually I've wondered if it would make more sense to default to PAX_MARKINGS=none, and have the hardened profiles (or the user in make.conf) set a different value. That makes some sense to me. The downside is