On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i plan on updating the latest glibc to add USE=suid. in pkg_preinst and
ROOT==/, the ebuild will read /proc/mounts for a devpts line with gid=5. if
it doesn't find one, i'll have it call `die`.
What about chroot builds?
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 12:30:08AM +1000, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 7/04/2013 16:53, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
On 06.04.2013 20:08, Michał Górny wrote:
As far as I'm aware, we don't really have much of a patch maintenance
policy in Gentoo. There a few loose rules like «don't put awfully big
On Friday 12 April 2013 02:50:20 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:15 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i plan on updating the latest glibc to add USE=suid. in pkg_preinst and
ROOT==/, the ebuild will read /proc/mounts for a devpts line with gid=5.
if it doesn't
Over on #gentoo-releng and in gentoo-catalyst@ we've been running into
binary package dependency problems [1]. Before EAPI-5 and sub-slots,
the version of dependency packages is not recorded in the binary
package metadata (the Packages file). For example, a binary package
for GCC built against
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted and
the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts mounted at all,
then it assumes you know what you're doing.
What I am saying is
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:25 PM, W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
In other words, “Why force folks to do this if there is no benefit?”.
This is understandable, but I think the broken binary packages [1] are
enough of a visible benefit.
I certainly agree. As I bump my own packages I'll
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Maxim Kammerer m...@dee.su wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted and
the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts mounted at
MF == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
MF don't do that.
*I* didn't.
I don't know /what/ added it, but something did. With noauto, just like
the other reported case.
It shouldn't matter how rare it is though. A general
On Friday 12 April 2013 13:20:11 Maxim Kammerer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
i don't know what you mean. if the ebuild detects devpts being mounted
and the mount is incorrect, it will die. if you don't have devpts
mounted at all, then it
On Thursday 11 April 2013 22:19:40 Duncan wrote:
Mike Frysinger posted on Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:49:00 -0400 as excerpted:
On Thursday 11 April 2013 11:43:59 James Cloos wrote:
MF == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
MF this should impact very few (if any)
MF users, so i don't think
What do people think of something like this? Obviously the equivalent
patch to prefix would need to include a test for
PREFIX_DISABLE_GEN_USR_LDSCRIPT:
Author: Gregory M. Turner gmturner...@ameritech.net
Date: Fri Apr 12 11:13:21 2013 -0700
eclass/toolchain-funcs: Add
On Friday 12 April 2013 15:41:55 James Cloos wrote:
MF == Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org writes:
It will impact everyone who has /dev/pts in fstab(5).
MF don't do that.
*I* didn't.
that you remember. i think it's more likely you copy pasted some line a
long time ago than baselayout
Hello everyone
Attached you will find the various changes I plan to apply to
kernel-2.eclass after a week if there are no objections, feel free to
take a look at them. A summary of the changes:
- Added a warning after the variables that modifying other variables in
the eclass is not
Hi,
I'm not sure if it's a sane way to push make -j1 via
src_compile() {
cmake-multilib_src_compile -j1
}
but I detected a lack of functionality in the current
cmake-multilib.eclass. Both cmake-utils.eclass and multilib-build.eclass
have it, so it might be sound to continue with this
14 matches
Mail list logo
