Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-10 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 8 May 2013 13:37:51 -0400 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Bottom line is that none of this should really be inconveniencing maintainers much - nobody is required to create unit files. However, if a friendly user submits a bug with one attached, then the maintainer should

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Handling of tests (was: GCC USE flag changes)

2013-05-10 Thread Ralph Sennhauser
On Wed, 1 May 2013 19:18:52 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 1 May 2013 10:14:02 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:25:40 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm also going to rename the test flag to regression-test or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-10 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Ralph Sennhauser s...@gentoo.org wrote: The other thing is those unit files really should come from upstream and other distributions urge their developers to work with upstream [1] Therefore I'd require an upstream bug for each unit that we add. Makes sense,