-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (19 May 2013)
# Unclear license. Bug #452418
# Removal in 30 days
x11-themes/pekwm-themes-hewphoria
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang
-BEGIN PGP
El dom, 14-04-2013 a las 11:40 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
Due reasons explained here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462052#c1
We would like to start a process of simplifying dotnet maintained
eclasses a lot because they are currently really hard to maintain. As a
start point, we
On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who cares
about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them that
it will only take 2MiB of storage, so please, quit complaining about this.
Practically speaking, I think
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol:
On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who cares
about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them that
it will only take 2MiB of storage, so please,
Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +
bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Sonntag, 19. Mai 2013, 14:59:21 schrieb Michael Mol:
On 05/18/2013 03:23 PM, Carlos Silva wrote:
Is the real problem just the god damn unit/init files?! Damn, who
cares
about 2KiB files in the age of GiBs?! You can install 1000 of them
that
J. Roeleveld wrote:
I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
inodes.
That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
storing lots of smaller files.
I guess the number of unit files is on the order of hundreds, as long
as you haven't configured an
On 19/05/2013 23:40, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
OS: Linux
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Is a stabilisation an enhancement per se?
Usually I think so yes. If it is an urgent stabilisation there is
priority field.
If all stabilisations are
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages
use them: we already mask/unmask them globally on arches where they are
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 21:08:53 +
bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person
whose email is mentioned below. To comment on this bug, please visit:
On 05/19/2013 02:40 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
fwiw the current situation works for me quite well.
--
On 05/19/13 17:47, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many packages
use them: we already
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many
Am 19.05.2013 18:03, schrieb viv...@gmail.com:
On 05/19/13 17:47, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
inodes.
That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
storing lots of smaller files.
I guess the number of unit files is
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
I don't see how this will avoid the issue of a limited amount of
inodes.
That is what I usually run out of before the disk is full when
storing lots of smaller files.
I guess the number of unit files is
TL;DR: I like the stabilization bugs as they are.
Summary: Please stabilize =dev-libs/libconfig-1.4.9-r1
We agreed a little while ago that bug Summaries should start with an
atom, if possible, and explain the action later. Also, robotically
filing thousands of bugs and making
On 5/19/13 6:40 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Private messages and public comments through bugzilla are so far
ignored, it seems, so let's try a venue where it's sure to cause a
flamewar instead. My apologies for the inconvenience.
Hey Jeroen, apologies if I have ignored any of your feedback.
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2013-05-19 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-php/phpcpd 2013-05-13 03:27:30 patrick
dev-php/phploc 2013-05-13 03:27:30 patrick
19 matches
Mail list logo
