Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rite of dev-python/elixir

2013-06-06 Thread Peter Alfredsen
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > IAN DELANEY posted on Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:55:16 +0800 as excerpted: > >> # Ian Delaney (06 Jun 2013) >> # Masked for removal in ~ 30 days. Upstream inactive dev-python/elixir > > Where's the bug reference one would normally ex

[gentoo-dev] net-fs/autofs needs a new maintainer

2013-06-06 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
On Friday, June 7, 2013, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:52:50AM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) wrote: > > On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > The previous maintainer of net-fs/autofs has gone MIA so the package > > > needs a new maintainer. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-fs/autofs needs a new maintainer

2013-06-06 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 12:52:50AM +0800, Dennis Lan (dlan) wrote: > On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The previous maintainer of net-fs/autofs has gone MIA so the package > > needs a new maintainer. There are quite a few bugs[1] as well. If a > > user wants to help

[gentoo-dev] net-fs/autofs needs a new maintainer

2013-06-06 Thread Dennis Lan (dlan)
On Sunday, June 2, 2013, Markos Chandras wrote: > Hi, > > The previous maintainer of net-fs/autofs has gone MIA so the package > needs a new maintainer. There are quite a few bugs[1] as well. If a > user wants to help, please reply here and contact > proxy-maint_at_gentoo_dot_org > > [1] https://b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: last rite of dev-python/elixir

2013-06-06 Thread Markos Chandras
On 6 June 2013 11:32, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > IAN DELANEY posted on Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:55:16 +0800 as excerpted: > >> # Ian Delaney (06 Jun 2013) >> # Masked for removal in ~ 30 days. Upstream inactive dev-python/elixir > > Where's the bug reference one would normally expect to see

Re: [gentoo-dev] About lafilefixer removal

2013-06-06 Thread Sergey Popov
05.06.2013 01:16, Samuli Suominen пишет: > On 05/06/13 00:09, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I >> am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never >> saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and palud

[gentoo-dev] Re: last rite of dev-python/elixir

2013-06-06 Thread Duncan
IAN DELANEY posted on Thu, 06 Jun 2013 17:55:16 +0800 as excerpted: > # Ian Delaney (06 Jun 2013) > # Masked for removal in ~ 30 days. Upstream inactive dev-python/elixir Where's the bug reference one would normally expect to see with such an announcement? AFAIK, simply inactive upstream hasn'

[gentoo-dev] last rite of dev-python/elixir

2013-06-06 Thread IAN DELANEY
# Ian Delaney (06 Jun 2013) # Masked for removal in ~ 30 days. Upstream inactive dev-python/elixir -- kind regards Ian Delaney