Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer features in portage: cgroup, network-sandbox, ipc-sandbox

2013-08-24 Thread Rémi Cardona
Le mardi 20 août 2013 à 12:26 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > 3. FEATURES=ipc-sandbox > > Requires: CONFIG_NAMESPACES, CONFIG_IPC_NS > > Applies to: src_* > > This one separates the ebuild's *nix IPC stuff from host. This includes > semaphores, shared memory etc. Similarly to network-sandbox, th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-24 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > Mixing stable and testing is precisely what package > maintainers (hopefully) do when committing new versions: building and > running new software on a known to be stable platform on the premise > that the new software is likely to be merged into the stable branch > (befor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving more arches to dev profiles

2013-08-24 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:28:24 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > Wow! That is something we actively encourage people to avoid. Mixed > systems are totally > unsupported and I am sure quite a few bugs are closed as invalid when > a mixed system is detected. Mixing stable and testing is precisely what

[gentoo-dev] OT: Whitespace in paths (was: Patch applying function for EAPI 6)

2013-08-24 Thread Martin Vaeth
Ulrich Mueller wrote: > [Whitespace in paths] >> Not that it's anywhere near supported most of the place. > > Many upstream build systems fail with it. Make and autotools are not able to handle whitespace reasonable. However, this does not mean that gentoo cannot: Build systems usually use relat