Hello, all.
I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
way of proceeding with it.
We've just lately finished the git-git-2 eclass migration. The old
eclass is no longer used and is marked for removal
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 08:10 +0400, Heather escribió:
[...]
Hello.
I used to mail you two times about it...
I have no developer status but I need to know if you mind to take me
on the board.
My recruitment bug is #461458.
Maybe I missed them for some reason :O, let me check (you
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org writes:
I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
way of proceeding with it.
TL;DR any futher, but I have few packages which use git-2 eclass and I
wouldn't like to
2. Kill EGIT_HAS_SUBMODULES and autodetect submodules,
I'm disagreed. Sometimes submodules, that repo suggests is unneded,
since they fetches external package, that specified as RDEP.
3. Kill EGIT_OPTIONS since it limits the possibility of changing eclass
code,
:-/
4. Kill EGIT_MASTER
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 07:30 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
4. Kill EGIT_MASTER (it's more trouble than benefit),
Only if EGIT_BRANCH will stay on it's place.
..and work as well as EGIT_MASTER. I've had issues at times trying to
get the branch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 08:46 AM, hasufell wrote:
I want the council to make clear whether useflags that are:
* unsupported by the maintainer * are known to break the build or
application at runtime * introduce security vulnerabilities
are allowed to
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 18:30:06
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.name napisał(a):
2. Kill EGIT_HAS_SUBMODULES and autodetect submodules,
I'm disagreed. Sometimes submodules, that repo suggests is unneded,
since they fetches external package, that specified as RDEP.
Then you are using
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 09:01:54
Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 07:30 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
4. Kill EGIT_MASTER (it's more trouble than benefit),
Only if EGIT_BRANCH will stay on it's place.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:34:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever it
requires. I don't have much time to invest on their packages and,
then, there
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:00:07 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What are your thoughts?
If possible, assuming it is not already possible I would like to see
support for checking out multiple repositories; that way the patches
can simply be obtained from a repository instead of having
Since the project lead doesn't respond to private mails, is not present
in the projects IRC channel and does not comment on my bug reports I
want to ask here for review of the following packages, because those are
non-trivial libraries:
SDL2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/27/2013 02:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever
it requires. I don't have much time to invest on their packages
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:37:44 +0200
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
From a fairly quick review:
smpeg2: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481792
https://481792.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=356542
What if what the debug flag does is changed in the future?
I'd suggest to drop the
Dnia 2013-08-28, o godz. 16:31:36
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 10:00:07 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What are your thoughts?
If possible, assuming it is not already possible I would like to see
support for checking out multiple
Just small, very small comments. To avoid being accused of bikeshedding,
I'm totally fine if you don't apply any of them. It's entirely up to you. :)
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=480826 :
if use directfb ; then
# since DirectFB can link against SDL and trigger a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/28/2013 05:53 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_mixer-${PV}
Why no quotes? ()
S=${WORKDIR}/${MY_P}
Why no quotes? ()
S=${WORKDIR}/SDL2_ttf-${PV}
I suggest quotes ().
Those are variable assignments and don't
What did you use that for?
Actually, for --depth 1 in custom non-maintained-already ebuild ;)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hello,
My previous mail didn't focus on the most important thing, so I'd like
to start another thread with a simple question: do we need to provide
a user-friendly ${DISTDIR}/egit-src/?
Currently the repository stores consists of either bare or non-bare
clones of the remote repository. We do not
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 16:13 +0200, Tom Wijsman escribió:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:34:00 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello
I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever it
requires.
El mié, 28-08-2013 a las 16:46 +0200, hasufell escribió:
On 08/27/2013 02:34 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
I would like to let you know dotnet team is needed of help. I am
taking care of some of its packages but mostly banshee and whatever
it requires. I don't have much time to invest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/28/2013 10:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
The new eclass is supposedly used by 732 in-tree packages [1], and
possibly a few dozens out-of-the-tree. Some parts of the eclass
API are barely used. I would really prefer to avoid yet another
eclass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/08/13 01:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
The question would be: do you feel like we should really provide a
verbatim clone of upstream's repository? Or should we focus on the
eclass' main goal, that is fetching the remote sources in the most
Somewhat unrelated, but please think about it when you make
such a major change:
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
EVCS_OFFLINE 0 // these are for make.conf
EGIT_REPACK 0
EGIT_PRUNE0
The latter two were always bugging me since they should better
be coupled with EVCS_OFFLINE:
IMHO,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:14:35 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you are talking about Heather, looks like for some reason I was
missing some of his mails (I was losing them), I am reviewing that
problem.
Just his mails or more than that? I see you are not on IRC as often as
in the
On 28 August 2013 16:00, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello, all.
I think I'm finally ready to put all the breaking awesomeness that was
waiting for the git eclasses. However, I'm wondering what's the best
way of proceeding with it.
We've just lately finished the git-git-2 eclass
25 matches
Mail list logo
