Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On 3 September 2013 16:17, Richard Yao wrote: > I admit that it is annoying > to view them in a web browser where the escape characters are not > parsed, but that is easily resolved at the terminal > You could plausibly also have a filter in bugzilla that detects escape codes in the log, and ad

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Richard Yao
On 09/02/2013 03:21 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I'm starting a new thread on this, because I think it might warrant some > discussion. > > I can see why someone might want to use escape codes for color displays, > etc. However, imo, escape codes do not belong in log files. > > mgorny say

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-games/neotools, dev-games/neoengine

2013-09-02 Thread Chris Reffett
# Chris Reffett (03 Sep 2013) # Dead upstream, outstanding security bug #260956. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-games/neoengine dev-games/neotools signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Zac Medico
On 09/02/2013 01:29 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:41:28PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 2013-09-02, o godz. 14:21:52 >> William Hubbs napisał(a): >> >>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 16:49:34 William Hu

Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs? (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs)

2013-09-02 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013 14:21:52 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > I can see why someone might want to use escape codes for color > displays, etc. However, imo, escape codes do not belong in log files. They belong there so future display can remain colorful. Why do they not belong there? What do people h

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-2.eclass: Add support for experimental genpatches.

2013-09-02 Thread Tom Wijsman
Hello everyone Please only respond on the gentoo-dev ML. Attached you will find a patch for kernel-2.eclass that adds support for experimental genpatches; a response to the positive feedback on the previous discussion [1], with subject "Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patche

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On 3 September 2013 09:22, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > I'd consider any tool as broken if it outputs escape sequences when > the output doesn't go to a terminal. (Unless such output was > explicitly asked for.) > However, what about when output is going to a terminal *and* a log file? It seems sma

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, William Hubbs wrote: > I can see why someone might want to use escape codes for color > displays, etc. However, imo, escape codes do not belong in log > files. > mgorny says many people benefit from having escape codes in log > files, but I see no benefit from it, and I

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:41:28PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-09-02, o godz. 14:21:52 > William Hubbs napisał(a): > > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 16:49:34 > > > William Hubbs napisał(a): > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 31,

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-09-02, o godz. 14:21:52 William Hubbs napisał(a): > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 16:49:34 > > William Hubbs napisał(a): > > > > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz

[gentoo-dev] rfc: escape sequences in logs

2013-09-02 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 01:33:19PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 16:49:34 > William Hubbs napisał(a): > > > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 11:26:30 > > > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > > > > > > > On Sat,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] git.eclass, git-2.eclass... git-r1.eclass?

2013-09-02 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 08:58:07PM -0400, James Cloos wrote: > > "TW" == Tom Wijsman writes: > > TW> Also, please just call it git-3.eclass as it is a major change; any > TW> other form of naming will introduce confusion (eg. -r1 < -2), also we > TW> probably shouldn't change git-2.eclass as

Re: [gentoo-dev] git-r3: initial draft for review [v2]

2013-09-02 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2013-09-01, o godz. 16:49:34 William Hubbs napisał(a): > On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 10:48:32PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2013-08-31, o godz. 11:26:30 > > Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > > > > > > On Sat, 31 Aug 2013, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > > And time for a small update.