On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 04:49:55 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
If I'm not mistaken, dirtyepic intends to patch gcc directly to enable
-fstack-protector, changing the default at that level so it'll be used
unless -fno-stack-protector is in CFLAGS. At least, that's how I
Le mardi 10 septembre 2013 à 17:10 +0200, Fabian Groffen a écrit :
On 10-09-2013 06:22:38 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
pkg_preinst() {
gnome2_gdk_pixbuf_savelist
+
+ # Make sure loaders.cache belongs to gdk-pixbuf alone
+ local
On 11-09-2013 10:51:22 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
shouldn't that be EROOT ?
and ED in that case too
Do we still use that in EAPI 3 ?
EROOT = ROOT + EPREFIX
ED = D + EPREFIX
Unless I misunderstand your question, that means yes, we do to me.
Fabian
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo
[ Apologies for replying so late
I am not intending to startup the discussion regarding systemd ]
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 09:36:47AM +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
For the record we did and still do support setups that upstream does not
care about.
* In the past, we had
El mié, 11-09-2013 a las 11:41 +0200, Olav Vitters escribió:
[...]
* We maintain networkmanager and bluetooth support optional, and this
has been the case since 3.2 iirc even though upstream flat out refuses
to merge our perfectly fine patches
Feel free to cc release-t...@gnome.org on
onsdag 11 september 2013 00.07.29 skrev Ryan Hill:
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:41:34 -0400
Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
A few thoughts:
1. The kernel expects -fno-stack-protector to be the default. What will
the effect be on kernel configuration once -fstack-protector is the
onsdag 11 september 2013 04.49.55 skrev Duncan:
(Tho jer points out that the parisc arch, among others, won't work with
that flag at all, and warns to that effect. So I guess the patch will
etiher be ifdeffed not to apply on such archs or will be conditionally
applied in the first
måndag 09 september 2013 21.00.12 skrev Ryan Hill:
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 08:21:35 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
So does anyone have any objections to making -fstack-protector the
default?
Now is the
