[gentoo-dev] m68k, s390, sh: ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=${ARCH} ~${ARCH}

2013-09-29 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
The m68k, s390, sh profiles have been modified to set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=${ARCH} ~${ARCH} Feel free to replace stable keywords by testing/unstable keywords on these arches. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfri...@gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: python-distutils-ng.eclass

2013-09-29 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (29 Sep 2013) # This eclass has been superseded by distutils-r1 and python-r1 eclasses # and will be removed on 2013-10-29. Please modify your ebuilds to use # the new eclasses instead. Bug #450770. python-distutils-ng.eclass -- Best regards, Michał Górny

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gst-plugins10.eclass: fix support for 1.2 series

2013-09-29 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Hi all, here is a little patch to gst-plugins10.eclass fixing SLOT definition for the new 1.2 release. Per upstream release mail, 1.* will remain API/ABI compatible. -- Gilles Dartiguelongue e...@gentoo.org Gentoo Index: gst-plugins10.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Upgrade Guide and EAPI

2013-09-29 Thread Luca Barbato
On 29/09/13 04:12, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: It's just a starting point, though. I still don't have a clear plan yet. After reading carefully the thread Ulrich pointed out, it seems that refactoring ebuild/eclass is invevitable, which calls for an overlay to carry it on. That would be much

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

2013-09-29 Thread Kent Fredric
On 29 September 2013 11:13, Martin Vaeth va...@mathematik.uni-wuerzburg.dewrote: The best solution I presently have for this problem, would be to have a PROVIDES-${PV}.json file in every package under files/ Not under files but in the eclass, and the rest of the work is done by the

[gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq. Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 9/29/13 2:41 PM, hasufell wrote: It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq. +1 to the reminder. It would be great to hear about specific

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread Thomas Kahle
On 09/29/2013 11:41 PM, hasufell wrote: It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq. Arch teams do not test them, so this is the business of the

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 23:41:03 schrieb hasufell: It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a library, especially when this is a non-maintainer stablereq. Arch teams do not test them, so this is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/30/2013 12:54 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 23:41:03 schrieb hasufell: It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before stabilizing a

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-09-29 23h59 UTC

2013-09-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2013-09-29 23h59 UTC. Removals: Additions: dev-lang/fsharp 2013-09-24 12:22:10 cynede net-wireless/mfoc 2013-09-24 15:24:26

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 8:14 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 09/30/2013 12:54 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Am Sonntag, 29. September 2013, 23:41:03 schrieb hasufell: It seems this happens more frequently these days, so I'd like to remind people to check stable reverse deps before

Re: [gentoo-dev] stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-29 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 9/29/13 7:41 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: Even then, we won't get much more than compile testing, or whatever test suites the packages happen to come with. That's right. I think we can rely on the time packages spend in ~arch to catch the issues that wouldn't come up with compile and test